Wave Motion: Examining Displacement of Particles

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the displacement of particles in a string stretched in the x direction, specifically examining which mathematical expressions represent wave motion. The expressions under consideration include trigonometric forms and polynomial forms, with a focus on the characteristics of progressive and standing waves.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of the given equations, questioning why certain forms do not represent wave motion. There is an examination of the distinction between standing waves and progressive waves, with attempts to clarify the implications of the string being stretched.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the nature of wave equations and engaging in a back-and-forth regarding the validity of the expressions. Some participants suggest that the language of the problem may imply a specific interpretation, while others challenge the assumptions made about the nature of the waves.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the definitions and characteristics of wave motion, particularly in the context of a stretched string. Participants are considering the implications of boundary conditions and the nature of superposition in wave behavior.

chaoseverlasting
Messages
1,051
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



The displacement of particles in a string stretched in the x direction is represented by y. Which of the following expressions for y describe wave motion:

1: cos kx sin wt
2:[tex]k^2x^2-w^2t^2[/tex]
3:[tex]cos^2(kx+wt)[/tex]


Homework Equations



Equation of a progressive wave is of the form [tex]y=f(t-\frac{x}{v})[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



The first equation represents a standing wave. The second obviously can't be it (its not of the form f(t-x/v) ). But I thought the third one would represent the equation of a progressive wave. It doesn't though. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x'=-x
wt+kx=w(t-k/w x')=w(t-x'/v)
(using v=w/k)
 
Yeah. I got that. But it isn't the answer. The third equation doesn't represent a wave. Why?
 
Why not?

cos^2 (wt-kx')=1/2+1/2cos(2[wt-kx'])
w'=2w
k'=2k

so the fn=A+Bcos(w't-k'x')

Looks like a sinusoidal wave to me.

What's wrong with using a standing wave? Isn't that what you'd get in a stretched string?
 
Yeah, you get a standing wave cause of superpoosition in a string. The thing is, that only one answer is correct. Maybe the language points to a standing wave?
 
You get a standing wave, because the string is stretched- so it must be held at both ends.
 
If a string is stretched, it doesn't necessairily mean that you would have to get a standing wave.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K