For a free particle,the one dimensional Schrodinger's equation gives a solution of the form Ae^i(kx - wt).This solution does not meet the normalisation requirement.According to Bransden-Joachain's texr,there are 2 ways out of this difficulty.One is to superpose and form localised wave packets.The other is to(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

"give up the concept ofabsoluteprobabilities when dealing with wave functions such as (above) which are not square integrable.Instead |psi(r,t)|^2dris interpreted as therelativeprobability of finding the electron at time t in a volume element drcentred aroundr,so that the ratio |psi(r1,t)|^2 / |psi(r2,t)|^2 gives the probability of finding the particle within volume element centred aroundr=r1,compared with that of finding it within the same volume element atr=r2.For theparticular case of the plane wave we see that...there is equal chance of finding the particle at any point."

My question is,why do we prefer the first solution(wave packets) to the second one(relative probabilities)?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Wave packet vs relative probability

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**