Wave packet vs relative probability

  • Thread starter xboy
  • Start date
134
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

For a free particle,the one dimensional Schrodinger's equation gives a solution of the form Ae^i(kx - wt).This solution does not meet the normalisation requirement.According to Bransden-Joachain's texr,there are 2 ways out of this difficulty.One is to superpose and form localised wave packets.The other is to
"give up the concept of absolute probabilities when dealing with wave functions such as (above) which are not square integrable.Instead |psi(r,t)|^2dr is interpreted as the relative probability of finding the electron at time t in a volume element dr centred around r,so that the ratio |psi(r1,t)|^2 / |psi(r2,t)|^2 gives the probability of finding the particle within volume element centred around r=r1,compared with that of finding it within the same volume element at r=r2.For theparticular case of the plane wave we see that...there is equal chance of finding the particle at any point."

My question is,why do we prefer the first solution(wave packets) to the second one(relative probabilities)?
 

Answers and Replies

DrClaude
Mentor
7,010
3,184
The wave packet solution is closer to the classical picture of a localized particle. It also applies to more physical situations.
 

Related Threads for: Wave packet vs relative probability

Replies
14
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
803
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
5K
Top