Wave Speed at the top, bottom, and middle of a Hanging Cord

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the wave speed at different points of a hanging cord subjected to tension from a mass. The wave speed formula used is v = √(T/µ), where T is the tension and µ is the mass per unit length. The tension at various points is derived: at the bottom, T = m1*g; at the middle, T = g*(m1 + 0.5*m2); and at the top, T = g*(m1 + m2). The final wave speeds are calculated based on these tensions, confirming that wave speed varies along the cord due to changing tension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and wave speed equations
  • Knowledge of tension in strings and cords
  • Familiarity with mass per unit length (µ) calculations
  • Basic principles of force analysis in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave speed in different mediums
  • Learn about tension variations in non-negligible mass strings
  • Explore the impact of mass distribution on wave propagation
  • Investigate the effects of oscillation frequency on wave speed
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding wave mechanics in hanging cords and strings.

FunkyFrap
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A hanging cord is attached to a fixed support at the top and is 78.0m long. It is stretched taut by a weight with mass 21.0kg attached at the lower end. The mass of the cord is 2.20kg . A device at the bottom oscillates the cord by tapping it sideways (Do not neglect the weight of the cord.)

1.) What is the wave speed at the bottom of the cord?

2.)What is the wave speed at the middle of the cord?

3.)What is the wave speed at the top of the cord?

Homework Equations



v = \sqrt{T/µ}
where T is the tension force on the string and µ is the mass per unit length.

The Attempt at a Solution



After reading my text and browsing the forums for help it seems that the tension of a cord with non-negligible mass in this case is T = µ(m1 + m2)L where m1 is the mass of the ball and m2 is the mass of the cord. T = \sqrt{µ(m1 + m2)*L/µ} = \sqrt{(m1 + m2)*L}

Plugging in I obtain 42.5 m/s
Which seems to suggest that the speed is the same at every point. However I'm having serious doubts about the answer I've reached. Is that true? Or am I missing something very important here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The tension varies at different points along this rope. Consider a point on the rope at a distance x above the bottom of the rope. What must the tension at this point be?
 
Nathanael said:
The tension varies at different points along this rope. Consider a point on the rope at a distance x above the bottom of the rope. What must the tension at this point be?

After doing some force analysis, would it make sense to say that T = m1*g + µ*m2*x?
 
FunkyFrap said:
After doing some force analysis, would it make sense to say that T = m1*g + µ*m2*x?
I think you're on to something, but the dimensions are not correct. \mu m_2x has dimensions of mass squared, but it's supposed to be in units of force.
 
See a piece of the cord (length Δy and mass Δm=μ Δy). It is acted upon by gravity and the tensions at its top and bottom. The downward forces are balanced by the upward tension T(y) of the upper piece of cord. The downward forces are gravity gΔm and the downward tension T(y+Δy).
T(y)=gΔm + T(y+Δy) or T(y+Δy) -T(y) = - μ Δy. The tension changes evenly along the cord, the slope is constant, T(y) can be represented by a straight line. At the bottom, the cord has to balance the hanging weight only. Write out T(y)...
massivestring.JPG
 
Nathanael said:
I think you're on to something, but the dimensions are not correct. \mu m_2x has dimensions of mass squared, but it's supposed to be in units of force.
I think I got it now after doing some thinkingAt the bottom, only the weight matters, right? so T = m1*g
At the middle, we have the weight and half(?) the cord so T = g*(m1 + 0.5m2)
At the top, we have the weight and full-cord so T = g*(m1 + m2)

Then I can solve for the respective wave speeds
I guess that T = µ*m*L equation is bunk?
 
FunkyFrap said:
I guess that T = µ*m*L equation is bunk?
That is completely wrong. Why do you think it can be correct at all? What is the dimension of the tension? Is it mass-squared?
You know the tensions at top, bottom, and middle already. If you think a bit, you could write out the function T(x).
 
FunkyFrap said:
At the bottom, only the weight matters, right? so T = m1*g
At the middle, we have the weight and half(?) the cord so T = g*(m1 + 0.5m2)
At the top, we have the weight and full-cord so T = g*(m1 + m2)
Right. Essentially, (for the purpose of finding the tension) you can treat the portion of the rope below the point x and the block as a single object. It's weight would be g(m_1+\mu x)=g(m_1+\frac{x}{L}m_2)
(x is measured from the bottom)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K