Way to generate energy in a closed system?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of creating a self-sustaining ecosystem within a closed glass box, specifically focusing on the generation of electricity to power a small LED grow light. Participants explore various methods and theoretical considerations regarding energy generation in a closed system, while addressing the implications of external energy sources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the power consumption of the LED is a critical factor, and if it is small enough, a battery might suffice.
  • Others propose using induction to transfer external power wirelessly into the sealed box, while still emphasizing the importance of the LED's power consumption.
  • One participant raises the concept of perpetual motion, asserting that without an external energy source, the system would be equivalent to a perpetual motion machine.
  • Another participant notes that no closed system can generate energy and must start with stored energy in some form, such as combustibles or electrical potential.
  • Some suggest that using aerobic and anaerobic bacteria could create a balance that allows for a year-long ecosystem, but this would still depend on the organic material available as fuel.
  • Alternative energy sources, such as nuclear power or advanced battery technologies, are mentioned as potential solutions for long-term energy needs.
  • Participants discuss the possibility of using solar energy, either through direct solar panels or by transferring sunlight into the box using reflective materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a fully self-sustaining system without any external energy source is not feasible, but there are multiple competing views on how to approach the problem of energy generation within the constraints of the closed system.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include limitations regarding the power requirements of the LED, the potential for using batteries, and the challenges of maintaining a closed ecosystem over an extended period. There are also unresolved questions about the efficiency of various energy generation methods and their practicality in this context.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring closed ecological systems, energy generation methods in constrained environments, and those interested in sustainable plant growth techniques.

Lucas38
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I’m looking to create a self sustaining ecosystem inside of a 4x2’ glass box that could be a totally closed system (with the exception of heat transfer, I can’t really prevent that). The idea is that I would bury it for a year and then dig it up again. In order for that to work I would need a way to generate enough electricity inside of the box to power a small led grow light, but I’m not aware of any way to do that. Is that even theoretically possible? I considered using a syphon to turn a small turbine but later learned that is impossible due to the way syphons work. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The key parameter is the power consumption of the LED. If small enough, a battery might suffice.

You could also use induction to transfer external power wirelessly through the wall of the box while keeping the box sealed. Even that way, the power consumption of the LED is still the critical parameter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and russ_watters
Have you considered perpetual motion?
 
Lucas38 said:
but I’m not aware of any way to do that. Is that even theoretically possible?
No. There will have to be some outside energy source for continued activity, otherwise it is equivalent to a perpetual motion machine. We seem to get away with it here on Earth because our 'outside energy source' is the Sun. In you experiment the 'outside source' is the LED.

@anorlunda made some good suggestions to make energy available.

Cheers,
Tom

p.s.What are you trying to grow?
 
Tom.G said:
No. There will have to be some outside energy source for continued activity, otherwise it is equivalent to a perpetual motion machine. We seem to get away with it here on Earth because our 'outside energy source' is the Sun. In you experiment the 'outside source' is the LED.

@anorlunda made some good suggestions to make energy available.

Cheers,
Tom

p.s.What are you trying to grow?
That’s a bummer, but I suppose a battery would work. I was hoping there would be some way to generate energy inside of the box, so it could be fully self sustaining. I’m planning to grow some bromeliads and some other small plants. Thanks for the info!
 
anorlunda said:
The key parameter is the power consumption of the LED. If small enough, a battery might suffice.

You could also use induction to transfer external power wirelessly through the wall of the box while keeping the box sealed. Even that way, the power consumption of the LED is still the critical parameter.
Those are both good ideas, thanks!
 
What is the ultimate goal of this?

Is the goal to create a closed system?
Or is the goal to grow plants without having direct access?

I mean, if there were a way to deliver power to the setup, would that directly violate your conditions?

Because, if you're literally trying to make a fully-self sustaining perpetual system, then you're out of luck.

But it depends on how rigorous you want to be.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Perpetual motion is a forbidden topic on PF. However, the OP clearly says:

Lucas38 said:
for a year

That is very far from perpetual. In #5, the OP acknowledges:
Lucas38 said:
I suppose a battery would work

So please, let's leave perpetual motion out of this thread.
 
It might worth noting at this point that the largest known 'closed loop' system (aka. Earth) still has external power supply (aka Sun).

Battery won't work for a year (at a power level required by any valuable experimental ecosystem, with reasonable size). Maybe something nuclear would.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
No closed system can "generate" energy - it has to start with all the energy it needs stored in some form: combustibles, trapped heat, electrical potential, radioactive material, food, etc.

You may be able to get colonies of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria to balance each other so one is "cleaning" the other's waste products well enough to last a year, but then your stored fuel/battery is whatever organic material they're eating - like yeast eating grape sugars in a wine bottle. But my gut sense is that photosynthesis actually takes quite a bit of light for something like a terrarium, and suitable long running batteries would be very, very expensive.
 
  • #13
Lucas38 said:
I’m planning to grow some bromeliads and some other small plants.

I'd look at one of those light tube skylights.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
  • #14
Tiran said:
That is a closed system materials wise, but runs on outside solar energy.
Amongst other things: "An energy center on site provided electricity and heated and cooled water, employing natural gas and backup generators, ammonia chillers and water cooling towers." [ref: Bystander's link]

I would suggest growing mushrooms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
  • #15
May I suggest looking at some of the eg USGS geo-physics field instrumentation ? 'Alaskan' systems cannot rely on solar power or wind due lonnng, dark Arctic winter plus snow & ice accumulation. At least you don't have to worry about reduced battery output due to the chill...

Similar issues apply to Oceanography stuff, intended to eg log sea-bed conditions, then pop up after a year or two.

IIRC, pulsed LEDs are much more efficient than the 'regular' connection, so consider 'Joule Thief' circuits to eke out the supply.

( OT: Will your minimal LED(s) provide the correct spectral mix for your plants ? Have you done in-house runs to check viability ?? )

IIRC, high capacity primary batteries can prove exceedingly expensive-- Just ask a wildlife photographer...

Really Big 'Recreational' / Sealed Lead Acid accumulator ? IIRC, they have a significantly lower self-discharge than the 'Starter' variety.

Have you considered the 'micro fuel cell' designs now available ? Could be their waste water etc is little enough to be used by your eco-system...
--

PS: hopefully your plantings will be benign, not currently forbidden in your locale...
 
  • #16
Is the system somewhere secure EG your garden? if so, a solar panel could power the LED's (and accurately reflect the day/night cycle for the project).

Alternatively, a method for transferring sunlight into the system would bypass the LED's and electrical requirements entirely. perhaps a long, Perspex rod which extends from the roof of the box and protrudes from the ground? the sunlight hitting the face of the rod would reflect down it's length and into the box.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
15K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K