Ways to Destroy Earth/Life on Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter keinve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around various hypothetical scenarios for destroying Earth or all life on it, exploring both natural and human-induced methods. Participants consider the plausibility, timelines, and mechanisms involved in these scenarios, including theoretical and speculative approaches.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the eventual explosion of the sun will end life on Earth in about five billion years, while others argue that human actions could lead to earlier destruction.
  • A proposal to release an enhanced version of smallpox is mentioned as a potential method for wiping out humanity.
  • Discussion includes the idea of catastrophic events such as a pole shift, with varying opinions on its potential impact on life.
  • Some participants mention that a large asteroid collision could lead to significant loss of life, though not necessarily the complete extinction of all species.
  • There are references to historical mass extinctions, with methane gas explosions and asteroid impacts cited as possible causes.
  • The notion that even severe destruction might not eliminate all life is raised, with bacteria potentially surviving various catastrophic events.
  • Speculative ideas include wandering into a black hole or merging with the Andromeda galaxy as methods of destruction.
  • Some participants question the credibility of predictions regarding catastrophic events, contrasting the Mayan calendar with scientific predictions made by figures like Isaac Newton.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the most plausible method for destroying Earth or all life on it. There are competing theories and uncertainty regarding the effectiveness and likelihood of various proposed scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of defining "destruction" and the potential for life to persist despite catastrophic events. Some claims rely on assumptions about the resilience of life and the nature of future events.

  • #31
How about shorting out the ionosphere by hanging large conductive cables down from space.
With out the protection of the ionosphere I don’t think life would last too long on this planet.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #32
Should the special/general argument get forked to a child thread? Is my contention that we are a specialised mammal that has learned to use its special abilities to adapt to non-special conditions, up the scientific creek with no paddle?
Can we really say that H. sapiens is in fact, a generalised omnivore with no specialisation (apart from a big brain, adaptation to upright walking, intricate and delicate interaction with materials to construct equally intricate objects -something no other species, special or general, does, adaptation of symbology and language, etc. and etc.)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
453
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K