We should give free money to the homeless

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Money
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of providing unconditional cash payments to homeless individuals as a potential solution to poverty and homelessness. Participants explore various perspectives on the effectiveness of such an approach, the implications of funding it, and the broader social context of poverty.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that giving money to the homeless could be beneficial, citing research that suggests free money does not lead to laziness and may actually help individuals improve their circumstances.
  • Others raise concerns about the demographics of the homeless population, noting that many individuals may have mental health issues or substance abuse problems that could complicate the effectiveness of cash payments.
  • A participant questions whether a one-time payment of 3,000 GBP would be sufficient to address the complexities of homelessness.
  • There is a discussion about the source of the 'free' money, with some participants expressing skepticism about government funding and the sustainability of such financial support.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the potential for inflation and economic repercussions if large sums of money are distributed without addressing underlying issues of poverty.
  • Anecdotal evidence is presented by a participant who shares experiences of individuals who received inheritances and how they chose to use that money, suggesting that not everyone would choose to stop working if provided with financial support.
  • Another participant references a study indicating that people generally do not behave in a way that aligns with the assumption that they would quit their jobs if given money.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the effectiveness of giving free money to the homeless. There are multiple competing views regarding the implications of such a policy, the source of funding, and the potential outcomes for individuals receiving the money.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about the motivations and behaviors of individuals receiving financial assistance, as well as the economic implications of funding such initiatives. The discussion reflects a range of perspectives on poverty definitions and the complexities surrounding homelessness.

  • #91
Evo said:
I didn't make money, I worked on the farm for the fun of it. During the summer when I was there, I stayed at her house and ate her food, I certainly didn't expect to be paid for having fun, I had to beg to be allowed to work.
I got paid for working on my grandparents farm when I was a kid. My parents would dump me and my sister while they went on vacation. After subtracting room and board, my very first paycheck I ever got was $7.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
Pythagorean said:
I would agree with Greg; money is not the primary incentive for me. Doing something meaningful is. Money is, however, a necessary condition (if insufficient) as far as it is needed to survive.
I suppose it would depend on where you draw your line/frame the question. If it is a question of +- a few thousand dollars, one can pick other motivations. But versus having no job, the money is by far the biggest issue.
 
  • #93
RonL said:
Hmmmm!:)
:DD
 
  • #95
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_inequality_in_the_United_States
In america the bottom 40% of people own .2 percent of the wealth
the top 1% own 34.6 percent of the wealth

Its really scary. Its kinda hard to even fathom or put into context. i know we say were a democracy, but technically america is an oligarchy (where a small group of people runs the country).

However, there is good news:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality
while america seems to be an aberation in the trend of developed countries, overall developed countries are far more equal in wealth, which means that as humanity continues to evolve as a whole, we will eventually reach a good equilibrium between opportunity and incentive
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
  • #96
I actually think that giving homeless people jobs would be better. You are basically making them work for their money, so they can spend their time doing something productive to society
 
  • #97
Usually people doing charity will offer them an initial (pretty) large amount of money first and then introduce them open jobs they can do.
If I were one of them, I'd prefer to get the money anyway.
 
  • #98
I'm not sure how relevant it is here, but:

But the biggest problem may be the way casino profits are sometimes disbursed. Per capita payments have grown as gaming revenues have risen. “These payments can be destructive because the more generous they become, the more people fall into the trap of not working,” says Ron Whitener, a law professor, tribal judge and a member of the Squaxin Island Tribe in Washington state. Of the 17 tribes in the study that handed casino profits directly to members, ten saw their poverty rates rise. Of the seven tribes that did not, only two saw such an increase (see chart).Per capita payments range from as little as a few hundred dollars a year to more than $100,000. In some tribes, members receive 18 years of per capita payments in a lump sum when they turn 18. “There are a lot of very successful car dealerships around reservations that make their money off 18-year- old,” adds Mr Whitener. -

One very small tribe in the study, Jamestown S’Klallam in northern Washington, has eliminated poverty entirely. That tribe does not issue any per capita payments and has used its casino profits to diversify into other businesses, such as harvesting huge molluscs for export to China. Squaxin Island, which reduced its poverty rate from 31.4% in 2000 to 12.4% in 2010, used casino profits to get into cigarette manufacturing about ten years ago. Leaders of the Siletz tribe, by contrast, allot 40% of the casino’s net revenues to per capita payments and only 17% towards economic development. Of the tribes surveyed, the Siletz has one of the highest poverty rates.
http://www.economist.com/news/unite...makes-native-americans-poorer-slots-and-slothYes, I know small sample and correlation instead of causative relationship. Nevertheless...
 
  • #100
I didn't realize there was already this thread on the UBI.
 
  • #101
houlahound said:
I didn't realize there was already this thread on the UBI.
Being newly retired, and getting a UBI, and knowing what I've become(LAZY!), I'm starting to see the right wing side of the thought process.
As far as I can tell, right wingers got their money either by being not poor in the first place, or gaming the system.
In any event, they understood long before I did, what it meant to be "self lazy".

One of them really needs to start a thread, on how they overcame that affliction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd
  • #102
I am certain that most people would not become lazy if their basic needs were provided. I think the opposite would happen.

Most people I know on retirement pension work harder than ever in volunteer clubs/committees/lobby groups...

Of course there is a percentage of people that really are just lazy.

I only imagine all the useless physics experiments I would be doing if I did not have to spend so much time on basic survival.
 
  • #103
OmCheeto said:
As far as I can tell, right wingers got their money either by being not poor in the first place, or gaming the system.

Or perhaps they hear this kind of comment, dripping with loathing, and decide to oppose your politics? Clay County, KY, which often tops the list of poorest US counties, went 9:1 for the Republican candidate this year.
 
  • #104
Vanadium 50 said:
Or perhaps they hear this kind of comment, dripping with loathing, and decide to oppose your politics? Clay County, KY, which often tops the list of poorest US counties, went 9:1 for the Republican candidate this year.
I am not in the US or understand their politics but have seen places in the South that are like third world hell holes and the people support policies that help them the least ie opposition to healthcare when their health is poor, opposition to welfare when they depend in food stamps, opposition to peace when they are cannon fodder, opposition to overseas manufacturing but addicted to cheap consumer products, opposition to science...

What's up with that, the South is a hard logic to follow.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd
  • #105
houlahound said:
I am certain that most people would not become lazy if their basic needs were provided.
...
See: Children

aka, You are correct.
 
  • #106
houlahound said:
I am not in the US or understand their politics but have seen places in the South that are like third world hell holes and the people support policies that help them the least ie opposition to healthcare when their health is poor, opposition to welfare when they depend in food stamps, opposition to peace when they are cannon fodder, opposition to overseas manufacturing but addicted to cheap consumer products, opposition to science...

What's up with that, the South is a hard logic to follow.
I'm in the US, and don't understand it either.
hmmmm...

ps. "Loathing" is a funny word.
 
  • #107
I was in Gallatin (spelling) as a teenager for a while living with rich people on a horse stud farm - kind generous people but the poor areas I only can compare to SE Asia's poorest areas.

I could not believe such poverty existed in the US until I saw it.

The poor SE Asians were positive people with a zest for life, the poor white Southerners were violent and angry and were in a state of preparation for some vague apocalyptic war.

Just my personal experience, not generalising.
 
Last edited:
  • #108
This thread is a necropost which no longer meets our guidelines, so it is closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
28K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K