Weak field general relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the gauge freedom in the weak field limit of general relativity, specifically under the coordinate transformation \( x^{\mu '} = x^{\mu} - \zeta^{\mu} \). The transformation of the metric perturbation is derived, leading to the result \( h_{\mu\nu}^{new} = h_{\mu\nu}^{old} - \zeta_{\mu ,\nu} - \zeta_{\nu ,\mu} \). The participants emphasize using the transformational law for tensors and suggest starting from the Pauli-Fierz action for a more rigorous approach to gauge transformations of the perturbation fields \( h_{\mu\nu} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and weak field approximations
  • Familiarity with tensor calculus and transformation laws
  • Knowledge of the Pauli-Fierz action in field theory
  • Basic concepts of gauge freedom in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the transformational law for tensors in detail
  • Explore the Pauli-Fierz action and its applications in gauge theories
  • Learn about infinitesimal gauge transformations in field theories
  • Investigate the implications of metric perturbations in general relativity
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in general relativity, field theory researchers, and students exploring gauge theories and metric perturbations.

Pietjuh
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I was asked to do a problem about the gauge freedom one has in the weak field limit in general relativity. I am given a coordinate transformation [tex]x^{\mu '} = x^{\mu} - \zeta^{\mu}[/tex]. Now I have to show how the perturbation of the metric transforms under this coordinate transformation.

The result should be:
[tex]h_{\mu\nu}^{new} = h_{\mu\nu}^{old} - \zeta_{\mu ,\nu} - \zeta_{\nu ,\mu}[/tex]

The most simple way to do this, i thought, was to just use the transformational law for tensors.

so: [tex]h_{\mu ' \nu '} = \partial_{\mu '}x^{\mu} \partial_{\nu '}x^{\nu} h_{\mu \nu}[/tex]

Using the fact that we can neglect the product of the derivatives of the small perturbation, I find that:

[tex]h_{\mu ' \nu '} = h_{\mu\nu} - (\partial_{\mu '}\zeta^{\mu} + \partial_{\nu '}\zeta^{\nu})h_{\mu\nu}[/tex]

From this point I don't know how to get rid of the metric factor in the second term, because if I can lose it, i think i would be able to come to the correct form that is wanted.

Can someone give me some hints? :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's more rigurous if you start with the Pauli-Fierz action and do the canonical analysis and determine the irreducible abelian infinitesimal gauge transformations for the P-F fields [itex]h_{\mu\nu}[/itex].

Just a thought.

Daniel.
 
If you start from [itex]g_{\mu \nu}=\eta_{\mu \nu}+h_{\mu \nu}[/itex],
then the tranformation law gives:

[tex]g'_{\mu \nu}=\partial_{\mu} x^{\alpha}\partial_{\nu} x^{\beta}g_{\alpha \beta}[/tex]
The left hand sides gives [itex]g'_{\mu \nu}(x')\approx \eta_{\mu \nu}+h_{\mu \nu}'(x)[/itex] and you can work out the right hand side explicitly.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K