Weak field Newtonian limit

lailola
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have to calculate the gravitational field strength g given by the De Sitter-Schwarzschild spacetime.

If G=c=1 I get:

R_{00}\simeq -kT_{00}+\frac{1}{2}kT\eta_{00}+\Lambda \eta_{00}\simeq

-kT_{00}+\frac{1}{2}kT_{00}\eta^{00}\eta_{00} +\Lambda \eta_{00}\simeq -\frac{1}{2}kT_{00}+ \Lambda =-\frac{1}{2}k\rho+ \Lambda

On the other side:

R_{00}\simeq -\Gamma_{00,j}^j \simeq -\frac{1}{2}\bigtriangledown^2g_{00}\simeq -\bigtriangledown^2 \phi

Equaling:

\bigtriangledown^2 \phi=\frac{1}{2}k\rho-\Lambda=4piG\rho-\Lambda

The first problem I have is that I don't know how to get this result in normal units, and the second problem is that, from here, I have to find the gravitational field strength g, and I don't know how to do it.

thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What precisely are "normal units"? I would say the units as you use here are just fine. Second, the gravitational field strength is given by

<br /> g^i \equiv \partial^i \phi <br />

whereas you have found an expression for \partial_i \partial^i \phi. Looking at the general method to solve the Poisson equation for lambda=0 should help you, e.g. here:

http://cass.ucsd.edu/~ppadoan/new_website/physics105b/Lecture3.pdf

You have an extra constant, which modifies this solution. See also

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0004037,

eqn.2.6.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
With 'normal' units I mean G=c=1
 
haushofer said:
What precisely are "normal units"? I would say the units as you use here are just fine. Second, the gravitational field strength is given by

<br /> g^i \equiv \partial^i \phi <br />

whereas you have found an expression for \partial_i \partial^i \phi. Looking at the general method to solve the Poisson equation for lambda=0 should help you, e.g. here:

http://cass.ucsd.edu/~ppadoan/new_website/physics105b/Lecture3.pdf

You have an extra constant, which modifies this solution. See also

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0004037,

eqn.2.6.

Thank you haushofer, those links have helped me a lot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lailola said:
With 'normal' units I mean G=c=1
Well, there is no c in your equations, so that's easy: just put G=1 :P

Glad I could help :)
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top