Undergrad How Can Wedge Products Be Used in Differential Geometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silviu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Wedge
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of wedge products in differential geometry, specifically regarding r-forms on a manifold M. It clarifies that any r-form, denoted as ##\omega \in \Omega_p^r(M)##, can be expressed using wedge products of one-forms, with the components ##\omega_{\mu_1 ...\mu_r}## being completely antisymmetric. The conversation highlights that while components of a 2-form may appear symmetric, they must be represented in an antisymmetric manner using wedge products, as seen in the expression ##\omega=\omega_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu \wedge dx^\nu##. This distinction is crucial for understanding the nature of r-forms in differential geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry concepts, particularly manifolds and forms.
  • Familiarity with antisymmetric tensors and their properties.
  • Knowledge of wedge products and their mathematical significance.
  • Basic grasp of tensor notation and operations in differential geometry.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of antisymmetric tensors in differential geometry.
  • Learn about the role of wedge products in the context of exterior algebra.
  • Explore the relationship between forms and their representation on manifolds.
  • Investigate applications of differential forms in physics, particularly in electromagnetism.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of differential geometry seeking to deepen their understanding of forms, wedge products, and their applications in various fields.

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am reading something about differential geometry and I have that for a manifold M and a point ##p \in M## we denote ##\Omega_p^r(M)## the vector space of r-forms at p. Then they say that any ##\omega \in \Omega_p^r(M)## can be expanded in terms of wedge products of one-forms at p i.e. ##\omega =\frac{1}{r!}\omega_{\mu_1 ...\mu_r}dx^\mu_1 \wedge dx^\mu_2 ... \wedge dx^{\mu_r}##, with ##\omega_{\mu_1 ...\mu_r}## completely antisymmetric. I am not sure why. If I have a 2-form, that would be ##\omega=\omega_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu##, but the ##\omega_{\mu\nu}## and ##\omega_{\nu\mu}## don't need to me in any relationship (equal or opposite), so how can I use the wedge product which would basically contain ##dx^\mu dx^\nu-dx^\nu dx^\mu## to obtain it? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An r-form is defined as a completely anti-symmetric type (0,r) tensor so indeed ##\omega_{\mu_1 \ldots \mu_r}## will be the components of that anti-symmetric tensor.

Now, since the wedge product basis is anti-symmetric, adding something symmetric to the components will actually not matter at all (its contribution to the sum would be zero), but seen as just a type (0,r) tensor, its component would be anti-symmetric.

Note that ##\omega = \omega_{\mu\nu} dx^\mu \otimes dx^\nu## is not a 2-form, since it is not anti-symmetric and r-forms are anti-symmetric by definition.
 
Silviu said:
...If I have a 2-form, that would be ##\omega=\omega_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu##...

It would be ##\omega=\omega_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu \wedge dx^\nu##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K