Weight Driven Generator Calculations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and calculations for a weight-driven generator system, drawing parallels to mechanisms like grandfather clocks. Participants explore assumptions about motor specifications, gear ratios, and the necessary weight to achieve a desired drop rate for energy generation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the no-load RPM of the motor is applicable when a gear train is attached, suggesting confusion about the motor's performance under load.
  • Another participant provides a calculation for the required mass to generate electrical energy, considering efficiency losses in both the motor and generator, leading to a substantial weight requirement of over 5000 kg for practical operation.
  • There is a mention of the relationship between potential energy and electrical energy, with a formula provided to calculate the necessary mass based on voltage, current, and height.
  • A later reply humorously reflects on the impracticality of the weight required, suggesting that the design may not be feasible for typical applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of motor specifications and the feasibility of the weight-driven generator design. There is no consensus on the practicality of the proposed system, with some participants highlighting significant challenges.

Contextual Notes

The calculations presented depend on assumptions regarding efficiency and the specific parameters of the motor and generator. The discussion does not resolve uncertainties about the impact of the gear system on motor performance.

OhioRay
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello! I am in the beginning stages of designing a system that would drive a generator using gravity - similar to an old grandfather clock. I have a couple of questions about my assumptions/design that I am stuck on:

- I found a motor which is rated 6v-12v DC, 188 RPM @ 12V with no load, and a max no-load current of 0.53mA. Does this mean that if I were to drive the motor at 188 RPM, I would see 12V of output, with a max current draw of 0.53 mA?

- For my gear system right now I am calculating that in order to drive @ 188 RPM I will need to have a four gear system, with the 2nd and 3rd gears on the same shaft in order to step the gear ratio twice. Basically I am looking at this: Weight drives Gear 1 (100 Teeth), Gear 1 drives Gear 2 (16 teeth), Gear 2 is on the same shaft as Gear 3 (100 teeth) so they have the same rotational speed. Gear 3 drives Gear 4 (16 teeth) which is connected to the motor shaft to be driven at 188 RPM. In order to achieve the proper output and the drop rate that I want, I calculated the first gear needs to rotate at 0.5 RPM, which gives me a drop rate of 1.2 inches/min - or 6 feet over the course of an hour. What I am unsure of is how to calculate the weight that I need to get this rate! How would I go about calculating the friction/other forces in the system which will create an equilibrium with a certain weight at this drop rate?

Any help on either of these 2 items is much appreciated!

Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
You can expect an efficiency of about 50% in the motor and 50% in the generator. So the generator voltage will be the same as the motor but the current generated will be about one quarter of the motor current.

Consider that you are converting potential energy E = mass * gravity * height, into electrical energy, E = volts * amps * time.
Therefore; volts * amps * time = mass * gravity * height
Hence; required mass = (volts * amps * time) / (gravity * height)

Use the MKSA units. One hour is 3600 seconds and 6 feet is 1.8288 metres.
Therefore; mass = (12V * 0.53A * 3600 sec) / ( 9.8 ms-2 * 1.8288 m)
mass = 1277.5 kg, or about one and a quarter tonnes.
Then apply the 25% efficiency by increasing the mass by four times to 5110 kg or 11,265 pounds.
 
OhioRay said:
a motor which is rated 6v-12v DC, 188 RPM @ 12V with no load
I'm very confused by the rest of your post, and the reply, after this statement. Doesn't the no-load rpm figure of a motor assume that there is no gear train attached?
 
Baluncore said:
Welcome to PF.
You can expect an efficiency of about 50% in the motor and 50% in the generator. So the generator voltage will be the same as the motor but the current generated will be about one quarter of the motor current.

Consider that you are converting potential energy E = mass * gravity * height, into electrical energy, E = volts * amps * time.
Therefore; volts * amps * time = mass * gravity * height
Hence; required mass = (volts * amps * time) / (gravity * height)

Use the MKSA units. One hour is 3600 seconds and 6 feet is 1.8288 metres.
Therefore; mass = (12V * 0.53A * 3600 sec) / ( 9.8 ms-2 * 1.8288 m)
mass = 1277.5 kg, or about one and a quarter tonnes.
Then apply the 25% efficiency by increasing the mass by four times to 5110 kg or 11,265 pounds.

That is...substantial. So to power the lamp for ~1 minute would require a 187 lb weight... Or to power the lamp for an hour using a 25 kg weight I would need a 374 m tall ceiling. Sounds like this would work perfectly for the Empire State building! Yea... I don't think that'll work! Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K