Weight of water in different vessels

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Himal kharel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water Weight
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the weight of water in vessels of different shapes when filled to the same height. Participants explore the relationship between pressure, force, and weight, questioning why vessels with the same pressure at the base can yield different readings on a weighing scale.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that if pressure is the same at the bottom of each vessel, the force experienced by the base should also be the same, but this does not account for differences in vessel shape and area.
  • Others argue that the volume of water in each vessel is different, which directly affects the weight, as weight depends on volume rather than pressure alone.
  • One participant points out that the area of the base must be considered, suggesting that a smaller base area under the same pressure results in a lower weight reading.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of center of mass and normal reaction forces, indicating that these factors complicate the relationship between pressure and weight readings.
  • Some responses emphasize that the pressure at the bottom is a function of height and density, but the total weight is influenced by the overall volume of water in the vessel.
  • A participant highlights the distinction between the force exerted by the water on the base and the force that the base exerts on the scale, noting that these forces do not necessarily equate.
  • Another contribution mentions that the internal pressure of the water does not affect the weight measured on the scale, as the scale measures mass rather than pressure effects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the relationship between pressure, force, and weight in differently shaped vessels. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached on the primary factors influencing the weight readings.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the assumptions about the uniformity of water density and the neglect of the weight of the vessels themselves, which may vary and affect overall readings.

Himal kharel
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Water is poured to same level in vessels having different shapes. If pressure is the same at the bottom of each vessel, the force experienced by base of each vessel is same. Why then do these different shape vessels have different readings when placed on weighing scale?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Volume may not be the same. Pressure is a function of depth, not volume, the volume is what the weight depends on. That's my guess.
 
Himal kharel said:
If pressure is the same at the bottom of each vessel, the force experienced by base of each vessel is same.
That's true only if the areas of the bottoms of the vessels are the same and ignores downward forces on any other nonvertical surfaces.
 
russ watters is certainly right.if the area of the base is less as compared to some other and provided the pressure is kept same, then the weight will be lesser.
but question arises when we consider centre of mass and normal reaction of the vessel with water.
 
Watters has it right...

Pressure is force per unit area; observed weight is due to the total volume of water...

You can see this if you consider,say, a three foot tall, 1/2" diameter pipe filled with
water (ignore the weight of the container), and some other very different volume
vessel, say a cylinder, a foot in diameter, of the same height.

Pressure at the bottom is the same, P = hd, but not total weight.
 
I guess i didnt explain the question properly. so here is a better explanation.
Consider two cylinders with same base area but one with converging walls and other with diverging walls. let they be filled to same height. now pressure is same at the base as given by P=hdg. So the force on bottom is same as given by force=pressure*area. this suggests that the force on weighing scale given by both cylinders is same. so they must have same readings when placed on scale. but it is not so. Please explain this contradictory result?
 
Your vessels aren't holding the same amount of water, so they don't weigh the same. Simple. Additionally, your vessels may weigh differently. If you want it in terms of the pressure, it is because the pressure is \rho g h at the bottom, but h is measured from the bottom of the vessel straight up to the top of the water, so with a container that gets narrower at the top, h decreases as you go away from the center of the base leading to a lower overall force. For a vessel that is wider at the top, you are neglecting the vertical component of the force on the walls of the vessel, which are no longer vertical. This leads to a higher overall force. Of course, no matter how you slice it, it comes down to one vessel having more water in it than the other.
 
I think your confusion comes from the difference between the force from the water on the base of the cylinder and the force of the base of the cylinder on the scale, the first depends on the height of the water, the second on the total amount of water and there is no reason for them to necessarily be the same
 
I gave the answer in my first post: the water imparts a force on the nonvertical walls and that force is transferred through the container, to the scale.
 
  • #10
The pressures from the water are contained by the walls of the vessel - no net force, which is why the weight on your scale does not depend on internal pressure, only mass.
 
  • #11
Take any aerosol or gas canister, weigh it, cool it or heat it some and weigh it again. definitely changes internal pressure, but i guarantee it'll weigh the same. Don't heat it up a whole lot though, because they tend to explode. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K