Hi everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Weinberg uses spatial translation invariance to derive the momentum operator. But the way he does it puzzles me. Here is an excerpt of the book.

Equation 3.5.1 is the definition of the unitary operator ##U(x)## for translation invariance:

$$U^{-1}(x)XU(x) = X+x,$$ with ##-P/\hbar## as translation generator, while Equation 3.5.6 defines the commutator:

$$[X_i,P_j] = i\hbar\delta_{ij}.$$ What I don't get is how one can "infer" from this equation the momentum operator in Equation 3.5.11, in particular the usual partial derivative.

Note that there is Equation 3.5.8, which states that ##U(x) = exp(-iP.x/\hbar)##, and from which I could fathom Equation 3.5.11, however. Is (3.5.6) just a bogus reference (even though it appears in both the 2013 and 2015 editions of the book)?

Thanks in advance to anyone who can help.

Pierre

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Weinberg LN in QM (Section 3.5): Momentum operator

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Weinberg Section Momentum | Date |
---|---|

I Weinberg and Ray Transformations – Ch2 App A. | Feb 23, 2018 |

A Peskin/Schroeder 4.77 page (about cross-sections) | May 1, 2017 |

A Weinberg: detecting changes to QM using atomic clocks | Feb 12, 2017 |

A Stephen Weinberg on Understanding Quantum Mechanics | Jan 4, 2017 |

I Weinberg Lectures in QM (2013 Ed.), Equation 7.10.15 | Mar 20, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**