Weird 2-spring problem with VERY limited data

  • Thread starter Thread starter McFate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Weird
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two springs arranged in a "v" shape with a 500g mass attached at the vertex. The springs stretch 9mm and 23mm respectively, but participants are restricted from measuring angles, raising questions about the feasibility of calculating the spring constants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the angles on the spring forces and the potential for multiple interpretations of the problem due to the lack of angle measurements. Some suggest that various assumptions about weight distribution could lead to different results.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the problem, with some participants suggesting the use of horizontal force equilibrium conditions as a potential avenue for analysis. Others express skepticism about the possibility of finding a solution with the given data.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that measuring the distance between the pegs may provide additional information, although it is unclear if this is permissible under the homework constraints. The discussion highlights the importance of both x and y components in equilibrium equations.

McFate
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two springs are hung in a "v" shape, and a 500g mass is attached to the point of the v.

spring-prob.jpg


One spring is observed to stretch 9mm, the other 23mm.

Students are NOT permitted to measure any angles, before or after the weight is attached.

Is it possible to calculate the spring constants of the two springs?

Homework Equations



F = -kx (Hooke's law)

F = k1*x1*sin(θ) + k2*x2*sin(∅) (Vertical component of force if the two springs' angles were known.)

The Attempt at a Solution



The problem doesn't seem solvable to me. If the angle of the springs from horizontal is very small, then the stretching will be the equivalent of many times the weight that is actually applied. At 30 degrees from vertical, EACH spring stretches as much as it would if it had a 500g weight pulling on it vertically. At smaller angles, each stretches further yet.

For example, at 10 degrees for both springs:

F = k1*x1*sin(θ) + k2*x2*sin(∅)
0.5*9.8 N = (k1)*0.009m*.173 + (k2)*0.023m*.173
... the ".173" (sin(10)) means that each stretches about 3x what it would with the entire weight hanging vertically on that spring alone.

If the angle of the springs from vertical is very small, then each will more or less carry a share of the weight, and both will stretch less than they would if they carried the weight alone.

Note that this is an "engineering" class rather than a physics class, so I don't think that the answer has to be rigorous or exact. But as far as I can tell, you could make various assumptions (each spring carries about half of the weight, each spring carries a share in inverse proportion to the amount stretched, both angles about 45 degrees, both angles about 60 degrees, one 45 and the other 60 degrees, etc.) that yield wildly different results.

Is there something obvious that I'm missing, or is this more likely a "make guesses for the things you weren't allowed to measure" sort of problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered the horizontal force component's equilibrium condition?
 
Nesk said:
Have you considered the horizontal force component's equilibrium condition?

Thanks for the response.

If I had the angles of the springs, the horizontal tension being equal between the two springs would form the second equation for my two variables (k1, k2):

4.9N = k1*(0.009m)*sin(θ) + k2*(0.023m)*sin(∅)
and
k1*(0.009m)*cos(θ) = k2*(0.023m)*cos(∅)

I have the overall lengths of the two springs (had to measure that before and after the weight to figure out how much they stretched). I'm going to go back to the lab and measure the distance between the pegs. It's not something we were told we couldn't measure, and it will give me the third side of the triangle which will allow me to use those equations.

But the question I had was: IF all I had was the data given originally, is there any solution? (I think the answer is: "no.")
 
In order to measure the amount of stretch for each spring, you had to measure the un-stretched length of each spring. If you know the distance between the pegs, then you can find all the angles. (That may also be "illegal" in the eyes of the instructor.)

Compare the two configurations:
1.) The locations of the enuds of the springs with the weight hanging.

2.) The locations of the ends of the springs without the weight -- even if you reconstruct this "theoretically" using the measured nu-stretched lengths.​

Both x and y components are important for the equilibrium equations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
15
Views
25K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
18K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K