Gold Member
- 2,389
- 5,216
If only I could kick 2020 in the nuts. 


But a little community up on the island of Newfoundland, in Canada. . .Continues to resist changing their name. . . .mfb said:The Austrian village of. . .

You can also go to France. Or go to Indonesia if you are British.OCR said:But a little community up on the island of Newfoundland, in Canada. . .Continues to resist changing their name. . . ..
![]()
What is this "reality" they speak of?Ivan Seeking said:Do we live in a simulation?
Keith_McClary said:What is this "reality" they speak of?
If you assume them to be 50/50, which is exactly what they do to arrive at that "conclusion".Ivan Seeking said:Chances are about 50–50
That's a really poor approach if the classes are arbitrary. Why these two? Why not (a) we are not simulated, (b) we are simulated by humans, (c) we are simulated by other individuals? Apply the same principle, now our chance to be in a simulation is 2/3. You can arrive at any other number just by changing the categories.“You just assign a prior probability to each of these models,” Kipping says. “We just assume the principle of indifference, which is the default assumption when you don’t have any data or leanings either way.”
So each hypothesis gets a prior probability of one half, much as if one were to flip a coin to decide a wager
mfb said:If you assume them to be 50/50, which is exactly what they do to arrive at that "conclusion".That's a really poor approach if the classes are arbitrary. Why these two? Why not (a) we are not simulated, (b) we are simulated by humans, (c) we are simulated by other individuals? Apply the same principle, now our chance to be in a simulation is 2/3. You can arrive at any other number just by changing the categories.
The next stage of the analysis required thinking about “parous” realities—those that can generate other realities—and “nulliparous” realities—those that cannot simulate offspring realities. If the physical hypothesis was true, then the probability that we were living in a nulliparous universe would be easy to calculate: it would be 100 percent. Kipping then showed that even in the simulation hypothesis, most of the simulated realities would be nulliparous. That is because as simulations spawn more simulations, the computing resources available to each subsequent generation dwindles to the point where the vast majority of realities will be those that do not have the computing power necessary to simulate offspring realities that are capable of hosting conscious beings.
Plug all these into a Bayesian formula, and out comes the answer: the posterior probability that we are living in base reality is almost the same as the posterior probability that we are a simulation—with the odds tilting in favor of base reality by just a smidgen. But Bostrom takes issue with Kipping’s choice to assign equal prior probabilities to the physical and simulation hypothesis at the start of the analysis. “The invocation of the principle of indifference here is rather shaky,” he says. “One could equally well invoke it over my original three alternatives, which would then give them one-third chance each. Or one could carve up the possibility space in some other manner and get any result one wishes.”
Such quibbles are valid because there is no evidence to back one claim over the others. That situation would change if we can find evidence of a simulation. So could you detect a glitch in the Matrix?
Houman Owhadi, an expert on computational mathematics at the California Institute of Technology, has thought about the question. “If the simulation has infinite computing power, there is no way you’re going to see that you’re living in a virtual reality, because it could compute whatever you want to the degree of realism you want,” he says. “If this thing can be detected, you have to start from the principle that [it has] limited computational resources.” Think again of video games, many of which rely on clever programming to minimize the computation required to construct a virtual world.
nsaspook said:
A special police unit has raided South Africa’s National Lotteries Commission (NLC) after 20 people shared a $380,000 jackpot with a remarkable sequence of winning numbers, leading to accusations of fraud.
True, that is correct in the literal sense (and yes, it is a bit ironic). But it can also mean "you" or "one" in a more colloquial sense. For example, you could say,mfb said:So far the first crewed flights of US spacecraft were always done exclusively by men. This is expected to change in July next year with the first crewed flight of Boeing's Starliner, carrying three men and one woman.
Her last name is...
In this case it would be man, not Mann.collinsmark said:True, that is correct in the literal sense (and yes, it is a bit ironic). But it can also mean "you" or "one" in a more colloquial sense. For example, you could say,
"Wie sagt mann 'Kartoffelsalad' auf English?" which translates to, "How do you say 'potato salad' in English?"
Ah, yes. You are correct.fresh_42 said:In this case it would be man, not Mann.
Wow, McDonald's has been in the new a lot lately!Ivan Seeking said:McDonald’s opens barber shop
https://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/mcdonalds-barber-shop-90s-inspired-golden-m-haircut
Here, the barber shops all closed, for some reason.Ivan Seeking said:McDonald’s opens barber shop
McDonald's here are only allowed to open their drive-throughs. And I need a haircut since I refused to go to the barber shop even before lockdown. I wonder if I can get one at their window ...Keith_McClary said:Here, the barber shops all closed, for some reason.
Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny duped a Russian FSB state agent into revealing details of an attack on him with the nerve agent Novichok, the investigative group Bellingcat reports.
Mr Navalny reportedly impersonated a security official to call the agent.
The agent, Konstantin Kudryavtsev, told him the Novichok had been placed in a pair of Mr Navalny's underpants.
I hope it's realAstronuc said:![]()
NEW YORK (AP) — The Girl Scouts are in a “highly damaging” recruitment war with the Boy Scouts after the latter opened its core services to girls, leading to marketplace confusion and some girls unwittingly joining the Boy Scouts, lawyers for the century-old Girl Scouts organization claim in papers filed in a federal court.
The competition, more conjecture than reality two years ago, has intensified as the Boy Scouts of America organization — which insists recruits pledge to be “trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous and kind” — has unfairly recruited girls lately, according to claims in legal briefs filed on behalf of the Girl Scouts of the United States of America.
Very few countries are boys-only:nsaspook said:Girl Scouts
I hope this isn't related to the claimed prediction by Nostradamus that Russian scientists will create a zombie virus that will cause human extinction in 2021.nsaspook said:More Russians falling out of windows.
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020...us-vaccine-stabbed-falls-out-of-window-a72427
Russian Scientist Who Worked on Coronavirus Vaccine Stabbed, Falls Out of Window
https://www.vox.com/2020/5/6/21248553/coronavirus-russia-doctors-windows-death
Why are Russian Coronavirus doctors mysteriously falling out of windows?
Nostradamus said:The sloping park, great calamity, Through the Lands of the West and Lombardy The fire in the ship, plague, and captivity; Mercury in Sagittarius, Saturn fading.
Hundreds of guests supposed to quarantine in connection with a recently discovered mutation of the Coronavirus have disappeared from the Swiss ski resort of Verbier, which is very popular with Britons.