Weird Probabilities: Is It Possible?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the probabilities of seemingly impossible events, such as walking through walls or walking on water, and the implications of quantum mechanics on these phenomena. Participants agree that while an infinite universe allows for all possibilities, the actual probabilities of such events occurring are astronomically low, estimated closer to 10^-1000 or even 10^-101000. The conversation also touches on the concept of quantum mechanics potentially allowing for violations of classical laws, though these remain highly improbable in practical terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with classical physics, particularly Newtonian laws
  • Knowledge of probability theory and its applications
  • Awareness of philosophical implications of infinite universes
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of quantum mechanics on classical physics
  • Research probability theory, focusing on extreme probabilities
  • Investigate the concept of Boltzmann brains and its philosophical implications
  • Study the relationship between infinite universes and probability outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, physicists, and anyone interested in the intersection of quantum mechanics and probability theory, particularly in discussions about the nature of reality and the limits of physical laws.

offroff
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I assume a lot of strange stuff could happen. Is it possible for anyone to approximate the following probabilities?

Walking through a wall.

Walking on water for a minute. (Jesus for example)

Dropping a ball but it goes up.

A ball teleports 5 metres away.

(I know all of it is pretty much impossible, still it would be great to know if it's closer to 10-100 or 10-1000).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If a highly unlikely event is going to happen in a finite time, then many less unlikely events would occur in a shorter time.


Think of a million monkeys on a million typewriters typing Hamlet. Before it gets typed perfectly just once, there are going to be a million instances where it gets typed perfectly except for one word. And for each one of the those, there will be a million instances where it gets typed correctly except for one page, etc.

So, for every person who is able to pass through a 6" thick wall, you'd find a thousand who might only pass 3" into the wall and then the phenomenon fails. For every one of those, you might find a thousand who pass only 1" into the wall.
 
DaveC426913 said:
If a highly unlikely event is going to happen in a finite time, then many less unlikely events would occur in a shorter time.


Think of a million monkeys on a million typewriters typing Hamlet. Before it gets typed perfectly just once, there are going to be a million instances where it gets typed perfectly except for one word. And for each one of the those, there will be a million instances where it gets typed correctly except for one page, etc.

So, for every person who is able to pass through a 6" thick wall, you'd find a thousand who might only pass 3" into the wall and then the phenomenon fails. For every one of those, you might find a thousand who pass only 1" into the wall.
If the universe is infinite, then there will be a planet with an intelligent life on which an intelligent being called Jesus will walk on the liquid water. In fact, there will be an infinite number of such planets.
 
In fact, in an infinite universe, we can all have our own personal Jesus. :)
 
Demystifier said:
If the universe is infinite, then there will be a planet with an intelligent life on which an intelligent being called Jesus will walk on the liquid water. In fact, there will be an infinite number of such planets.

Not true. Granted, an infinite universe is a universe in which all things that can happen will happen. But it does not mean laws of physics can be violated.
 
offroff said:
(I know all of it is pretty much impossible, still it would be great to know if it's closer to 10-100 or 10-1000).
Definitely closer to 10-1000. Actually I think the numbers are going to be more like 10-101000.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Not true. Granted, an infinite universe is a universe in which all things that can happen will happen. But it does not mean laws of physics can be violated.
The idea was that laws of quantum mechanics allow (with a ridiculously small probability) violation of classical laws at the macroscopic level. In particular, according to quantum mechanics, the classical Newton law of gravity is valid only on average. This opens the possibility of walking on the water by violating the Newton law of gravity.

By the way, you have received the award for the best humor. How come that you haven't recognized that the post on quantum Jesus walking on the water was actually a joke?
 
Demystifier said:
By the way, you have received the award for the best humor. How come that you haven't recognized that the post on quantum Jesus walking on the water was actually a joke?

You mean the opening post? I guess I thought that was actually the gist of the OP's post.
 
A better question for the OP, and the answer is inherent in the question, is to look at the wikipedia article for a hydrogen atom. Look at the probability that an electron will be found in a given "spot". You could think of that as a microscopic and simple model of probablities that CAN be mapped.

@Demystifier: The OP... I don't know, I thought that what Dave said was his gist too. I didn't get a lot of "haha" from him. Ask yourself where this question leads, and why it was posted in QM? The classic example most kids learn is, "There is a low, but definite possiblity that all of the oxygen molecules in the room could be found in only half of it for a moment." To bring such extreme violations of physics into it seems to be that he was looking for an excuse for some New-Agey horse****.
 
  • #10
Thanks for the answers. I'm a philosophy freak but not a religious freak. The reason I asked this question is to see if anyone possibly can approximate stuff like that, but I guess not.
 
  • #11
offroff said:
The reason I asked this question is to see if anyone possibly can approximate stuff like that, but I guess not.
We can.

The straightforward answer is this: the probability of such an event would require waiting many times longer than the lifetime of the universe for it to happen.
 
  • #12
Demystifier said:
By the way, you have received the award for the best humor. How come that you haven't recognized that the post on quantum Jesus walking on the water was actually a joke?

As was my joke about a personal Jesus for those of you who grew up after Depeche Mode's song was popular.

- Curtis
 
  • #13
inflector said:
As was my joke about a personal Jesus for those of you who grew up after Depeche Mode's song was popular.

- Curtis

I heard that song when I was 12 years old at camp, and spent 5 years humming it off-key to anyone who would listen trying to find out what it was (I forgot the lyrics). Finally I heard it in a shop and cornered some poor cashier and demanded to know what song this was. I think he believed I was going to get angry... poor guy. It must have been odd for him when a 6'+ guy in a trencoat (I WAS YOUNG!) skipped out the door humming the name of the group... :blush:
 
  • #14
Frame Dragger said:
... spent 5 years humming it off-key to anyone who would listen trying to find out what it was (I forgot the lyrics).

How do you hum a Depeche Mode song? It's one note... :biggrin:
 
  • #15
I already said what I believe about the probabilities of such events so I don't need to know I need to wait for them...

Just forget these questions. But it is very interesting that some of you somehow percieve these questions as some kind of threat.

Extremely small probabilities might explain why we are here. Some people believe that the universe started when all the atoms "went to the same corner of the room" by chance. I don't believe that but it's still theories I need to relate to and therefore I want a better feeling for sick small probabilities.

There are also a lot more strange probability discussions going on. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain is one interesting example. Great references to read on that page.
 
  • #16
offroff said:
But it is very interesting that some of you somehow percieve these questions as some kind of threat.
It is very interesting that you perceive our answers as some kind of indication that we feel threatened.

I think we're more humouring your questions because it's apparent you kind of already know there's no meaningful answer; you are just making discussion fodder.

Your opening post has the smell of an agenda that you have not yet shared. Let's just have it then.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
I'll post another question and u will be able to speculate a lot more about my agenda.
 
  • #18
DaveC426913 said:
You mean the opening post? I guess I thought that was actually the gist of the OP's post.
I meant my (first) post.
 
  • #19
DaveC426913 said:
How do you hum a Depeche Mode song? It's one note... :biggrin:

I didn't say it was a pleasant thing, to listen to me hum... :smile:
 

Similar threads

High School Probability - two possible points of view?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
High School How does the electric field of an electron compare to its probability wave?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
How do i visualize probability in double slit
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
MHB Probability of misprints on each page
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
MHB Vertical / Horizontal Displacements
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
What type of toilet do I have?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
577
I need help, please, designing a pool sensor for breaking . . .
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
616
Undergrad How can I tell how much an object will shrink when it moves away?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
High School Are Algebra, Geometry, Probability innate or cultural?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
How Can a Ship Safely Brake in Space Without Crushing Its Inhabitants?
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
11K