Welcome Newbie: Discovering the Edge of the Universe

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iflexit_1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the observable universe, particularly focusing on the implications of the accelerated expansion of space on the visibility of distant galaxies and the light they emit. Participants explore concepts related to cosmology, the cosmic microwave background, and the limitations of observing distant objects in the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the edge of the observable universe is about 46 billion light years (bly) and questions whether the galaxy observed is the same as when it emitted the photon, given the expansion of space.
  • Another participant clarifies that the cosmic microwave background (CMB) sets the edge of the visible universe and that the universe was much smaller when the CMB was emitted, suggesting that the first galaxies formed significantly later.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of continued accelerated expansion, with one participant stating that light emitted from beyond approximately 16 billion light years will never reach us.
  • One participant expresses agreement with the points made about the limitations of observing distant galaxies and the implications of the standard cosmological model (LambdaCDM).
  • A participant introduces a hypothetical scenario regarding accelerating to the speed of light and the functionality of headlights, prompting a technical response about the nature of light and relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the implications of the accelerated expansion of the universe and the limitations it imposes on observing distant galaxies. However, there are nuances in understanding the timeline of galaxy formation and the specifics of the cosmic microwave background that remain open for further discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the exact timeline of galaxy formation relative to the emission of the CMB and the implications of the standard cosmological model, which may depend on specific definitions and assumptions not fully explored in the discussion.

iflexit_1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone! I'm new to the board, so thought I'd take a moment and introduce myself. I have a degree in Liberal Arts, but like so many of us, the first time I gazed upward on a dark night and wondered in amazement, I was hooked. I have enjoyed perusing so many of your contributions, and hope in some small way I will be able to add a bit of knowledge to the forum.
Now I pose a question. I understand that due to the accelerated expansion of space, that the edge of the observable universe is about 46 bly. Now, a galaxy omits a photon aproximately 13.7 billion years ago. Space is expanding, so the space traversed by the photon expands behind it during the trip. Consequently, by the time the photon reaches us, the galaxy is about three times further. My question is this. Even though the photon has been stretched, and the galaxy is at a greater distance than 13.7 bly, won't the galaxy we observe when the photon reaches us be the galaxy as it appeared when it first emitted the photon? At 46 bly, and space still expanding, we may never see the photons emitted at that distance. Correct? In fact, our galaxy at 46 bly may have long merged with other galaxies.
 
Space news on Phys.org
iflexit_1 said:
Now I pose a question. I understand that due to the accelerated expansion of space, that the edge of the observable universe is about 46 bly. Now, a galaxy omits a photon aproximately 13.7 billion years ago. Space is expanding, so the space traversed by the photon expands behind it during the trip. Consequently, by the time the photon reaches us, the galaxy is about three times further.
Actually, the edge of the visible universe is set by the cosmic microwave background, which was emitted at the time that the universe became transparent. The universe was just over 1000 times smaller then, so that radiation was emitted a mere 46 million light years away. It's just that due to the expansion it has taken 13.7 billion years to get here (for every light year the photon moved, the space between us and the photon expanded significantly, so that it took so long).

iflexit_1 said:
My question is this. Even though the photon has been stretched, and the galaxy is at a greater distance than 13.7 bly, won't the galaxy we observe when the photon reaches us be the galaxy as it appeared when it first emitted the photon?
Yes, basically. But bear in mind that there were no galaxies when the CMB was emitted. The first galaxies don't appear until the universe was somewhere around the time that the universe had expanded by a factor of 50 from the emission of the CMB (I'd have to look up where this was in time and distance).

iflexit_1 said:
At 46 bly, and space still expanding, we may never see the photons emitted at that distance. Correct? In fact, our galaxy at 46 bly may have long merged with other galaxies.
If the accelerated expansion continues, we can never see anything that is currently beyond about 16 billion light years, because beyond that there will always be more space left to travel than the photon will pass.
 
iflexit_1 said:
At 46 bly, and space still expanding, we may never see the photons emitted at that distance. Correct? In fact, our galaxy at 46 bly may have long merged with other galaxies.

Correct. According to standard cosmo, light emitted today, at that distance will never reach us. Or indeed light emitted today from any distance beyond the 16 billion lightyears that Chalnoth mentioned.

I concur with each point in Chalnoth's response.
Good questions, iflexit. Welcome. I hope to see more of your posts.

(Most of the time on this forum we are talking about details features consequences of the standard cosmological model, in its various versions. It gets tedious always repeating this and you probably realized it already :biggrin:. So I guess we should just assume it unless otherwise specified. The standard model is called LambdaCDM, and the cosmo constant Lambda is the thing that causes the very gradual acceleration resulting in the presence of that 16 billion lightyear horizon.)
 
Last edited:
Kudos to you, gentlemen. You have certainly provided me with a better understanding.
Chalnoth, I believe the distance for galaxy formation is about 13.2 bly, and therefore created when the universe was only about 500 million years old.
I just have to throw one more inane one out. My high school physics teacher (1968) asked this question of the class, and I've never forgotten it. If we get into a car and accelerate to the speed of light, then turn the headlights on, will they work?
 
You can't quite accelerate all the way to the speed of light (basically you would need an infinite fuel supply to offset your car's dilating mass), but the lights would work as normal (the rules of physics are relative), although they mightn't be terribly helpful (for navigating obstacles that have almost reached you by the time you see the light that they reflected).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
7K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K