I What are anomalies in quantum field theory?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter KleinMoretti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum field theory
KleinMoretti
Messages
112
Reaction score
5
from the little i understand there are certain symmetries that are broken in quantum field theory, i also know that gauge symmetries must cancel in order to avoid inconsistencies in the theory.

if gauge anomalies need to be cancelled does that mean they dont correspond to a physical non-conserved current and if that's the case what about a chiral anomaly which does correspond to a physical non-conserved current?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KleinMoretti said:
if gauge anomalies need to be cancelled does that mean they dont correspond to a physical non-conserved current and if that's the case what about a chiral anomaly which does correspond to a physical non-conserved current?
Gauge "symmetries" don't correspond to conserved currents, to begin with, irrespective of anomalies. Chiral symmetry is not a gauge symmetry.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
KleinMoretti said:
from the little i understand there are certain symmetries that are broken in quantum field theory, i also know that gauge symmetries must cancel in order to avoid inconsistencies in the theory.

if gauge anomalies need to be cancelled does that mean they dont correspond to a physical non-conserved current and if that's the case what about a chiral anomaly which does correspond to a physical non-conserved current?
My 2 cents: anomalies concerning gauge symmetries (or better: gauge redundancies) are all about degrees of freedom. In QED you start out classically with a spin-1 field having 2 physical degrees of freedom, and after quantization you want to keep it that way. That means you want to retain the gauge symmetry. If an anomaly breaks this gauge symmetry suddenly the amount of degrees of freedom would change, and we have no idea what that means in the original scheme of quantization.

The same goes for e.g. string theory. In the Polyakov-formulation you start out with conformal symmetry. That symmetry garantuees that the worldsheet metric can be gauge fixed completely. After quantization you want to keep that conformal symmetry, because otherwise the metric would obtain a degree of freedom which you don't know how to interpret.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
haushofer said:
If an anomaly breaks this gauge symmetry suddenly the amount of degrees of freedom would change, and we have no idea what that means in the original scheme of quantization.
The main problem with breaking of gauge symmetry is that the resulting theory is no longer unitary. In older literature it is argued that the main problem is non-renormalizability, but this is not such a big problem if we take the point of view that all theories are just effective theories after all, so they don't need to be renormalizable.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top