Undergrad What are anomalies in quantum field theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KleinMoretti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum field theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Anomalies in quantum field theory, particularly gauge anomalies, must be canceled to maintain consistency within the theory. Gauge symmetries do not correspond to conserved currents, while chiral anomalies do represent physical non-conserved currents. The preservation of gauge symmetry is crucial for retaining the correct number of degrees of freedom in quantized theories, such as Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) and string theory. Breaking gauge symmetry leads to non-unitary theories, complicating the interpretation of degrees of freedom and the overall framework of quantization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gauge symmetries in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with chiral anomalies and their implications
  • Knowledge of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) and its quantization
  • Basic concepts of string theory and conformal symmetry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of gauge anomalies in Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
  • Explore the role of chiral anomalies in particle physics
  • Study the Polyakov formulation of string theory and its symmetries
  • Investigate the concepts of unitarity and renormalizability in quantum field theories
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum field theorists, and students studying particle physics and string theory who seek to understand the complexities of anomalies and their impact on theoretical frameworks.

KleinMoretti
Messages
112
Reaction score
5
from the little i understand there are certain symmetries that are broken in quantum field theory, i also know that gauge symmetries must cancel in order to avoid inconsistencies in the theory.

if gauge anomalies need to be cancelled does that mean they dont correspond to a physical non-conserved current and if that's the case what about a chiral anomaly which does correspond to a physical non-conserved current?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KleinMoretti said:
if gauge anomalies need to be cancelled does that mean they dont correspond to a physical non-conserved current and if that's the case what about a chiral anomaly which does correspond to a physical non-conserved current?
Gauge "symmetries" don't correspond to conserved currents, to begin with, irrespective of anomalies. Chiral symmetry is not a gauge symmetry.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
KleinMoretti said:
from the little i understand there are certain symmetries that are broken in quantum field theory, i also know that gauge symmetries must cancel in order to avoid inconsistencies in the theory.

if gauge anomalies need to be cancelled does that mean they dont correspond to a physical non-conserved current and if that's the case what about a chiral anomaly which does correspond to a physical non-conserved current?
My 2 cents: anomalies concerning gauge symmetries (or better: gauge redundancies) are all about degrees of freedom. In QED you start out classically with a spin-1 field having 2 physical degrees of freedom, and after quantization you want to keep it that way. That means you want to retain the gauge symmetry. If an anomaly breaks this gauge symmetry suddenly the amount of degrees of freedom would change, and we have no idea what that means in the original scheme of quantization.

The same goes for e.g. string theory. In the Polyakov-formulation you start out with conformal symmetry. That symmetry garantuees that the worldsheet metric can be gauge fixed completely. After quantization you want to keep that conformal symmetry, because otherwise the metric would obtain a degree of freedom which you don't know how to interpret.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
haushofer said:
If an anomaly breaks this gauge symmetry suddenly the amount of degrees of freedom would change, and we have no idea what that means in the original scheme of quantization.
The main problem with breaking of gauge symmetry is that the resulting theory is no longer unitary. In older literature it is argued that the main problem is non-renormalizability, but this is not such a big problem if we take the point of view that all theories are just effective theories after all, so they don't need to be renormalizable.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K