I What Are Classical Lie Algebras A, B, C, and D?

HDB1
Messages
77
Reaction score
7
TL;DR Summary
..
Dear @fresh_42 , Hope you are well.

Please, I have a question if you do not mind, about Lie Algebra,

In page 2 in the book of Lie algebra, written by Humphreys,

Classical Lie algebras
, ##A, B, C## and ##D##, I did not get it well, especially, symplectic and orthogonal..

Could you please explain with simple example of them.

Sorry for bothering you, and thank you so much in advance,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HDB1 said:
TL;DR Summary: ..

Dear @fresh_42 , Hope you are well.

Please, I have a question if you do not mind, about Lie Algebra,

In page 2 in the book of Lie algebra, written by Humphreys,

Classical Lie algebras
, ##A, B, C## and ##D##, I did not get it well, especially, symplectic and orthogonal..

Could you please explain with simple example of them.

Sorry for bothering you, and thank you so much in advance,
You are asking him to write a book chapter! You need to be more specific. Did you get type A? What exactly did you not understand about B, C and D?
 
Dear @martinbn,

No, classical lie algebras A,B,C, and D are not chapters, they are definitions in page number 2.

Thanks,
 
HDB1 said:
Dear @martinbn,

No, classical lie algebras A,B,C, and D are not chapters, they are definitions in page number 2.

Thanks,
I know what they are! My point is that your question is too general.

I can ask you again. Did you understand type A? What exactly do you find unclear about types B, C and D?
 
HDB1 said:
TL;DR Summary: ..

Dear @fresh_42 , Hope you are well.

Please, I have a question if you do not mind, about Lie Algebra,

In page 2 in the book of Lie algebra, written by Humphreys,

Classical Lie algebras
, ##A, B, C## and ##D##, I did not get it well, especially, symplectic and orthogonal..

Could you please explain with simple example of them.

Sorry for bothering you, and thank you so much in advance,
He has already written an insights article about this. Have you read it? https://www.physicsforums.com/insig...h-the-basics/#3-Classical-simple-Lie-Algebras
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top