What Are Orbital Vectors and How Do I Calculate Them?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Solistics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    hand Orbits
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of orbital vectors, particularly in the context of astrophysics. Participants explore the methods for calculating orbits using known parameters, including the vis-viva equation and the implications of different constants and values.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration with learning to calculate orbits and seeks guidance on orbital vectors and relevant equations.
  • Another participant suggests that calculating orbits is tedious and likely requires calculus.
  • A participant shares their attempt to calculate the moon's velocity using the vis-viva equation but questions the accuracy of their result.
  • Another participant challenges the accuracy of the initial calculation, pointing out potential errors in the use of constants and units.
  • One participant proposes an alternative method for calculating the moon's orbital velocity, assuming a circular orbit and using the mass of the Earth.
  • There is a discussion about the accuracy of the gravitational constant G and its implications for calculations involving the moon's mass.
  • A participant acknowledges a mistake in their earlier calculation and corrects their approach, leading to results that align with external sources.
  • Another participant questions the accuracy of a proposed velocity estimate and discusses the significance of errors in calculations.
  • One participant expresses interest in the source of the gravitational parameter used in calculations and reflects on their earlier mistakes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for calculating orbital vectors, and multiple competing views and approaches are presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of using accurate values for constants and the potential for significant errors based on assumptions made in calculations. There is also mention of the need for careful attention to units.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in astrophysics, orbital mechanics, and those seeking to understand the calculations involved in determining orbital vectors may find this discussion beneficial.

Solistics
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm fairly new to astrophysics, but I'm genuienly interested on knowing how to calculate orbits. I've been trying to do so on my own but I just find myself extremely frustrated. :confused: I'm trying to figure out what orbital vectors are and how i can calculate them using known orbital parameters. If i can get over this hurdle i should be all set.:approve:

thanks.

P.S. any sites that are helpful (lists of equations, sources etc.) would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Although I have never attempted to calculate the orbits I would say it would be it would

be a VERY tedious job to do. I would also think that you would need calculus to be able

to calculate accurately.
 
ok, I'm having difficulties in finding the velocity of the moon from a certain distance from the earth,

the equation I'm using is the vis-viva equation:

v=[tex]\sqrt({}\mu*(2/r-1/a))[/tex]

[tex]\mu=GM[/tex]=3.98694E+14

r=radial distance from focus to orbiting object=369397 km (periapsis of moon)
a=semi-major axis=3847487 km

the end value that i got is 45332.04235 m/s !
somethings not right!
 
Try as I might I cannot reproduce your result. You are probably doing multiple things wrong.
  1. The equation is
    [tex]v=\sqrt{\mu\left(\frac 2 r - \frac 1 a\right)}[/tex]
    Did you take the square root of the whole thing?

    2. μE is 398,600.442 km3/s2, or 3.98600442×1014 m3/s2.
    A couple of things to note:
    • This value is known very precisely. The error in μE is very, very small compared to the error in G. (Almost 9 significant digits versus 4 or so.)
    • UNITS, UNITS, UNITS. You have a number, no units. Lack of attention to units is most likely one of the sources of your error.
  2. The Moon's semimajor axis is 384,399 km, not 3847487 km. This is almost certainly another source of your error.
 
Last edited:
ok, i tried all you suggested however i still have a number of .2454 km/s or 245.5 m/s. I'm not sure this is right because of these values: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/moonfact.html"
it says that min. orbital speed is 0.964 km/s. I'm not sure what to think now.:confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi Solistics,

For the moon problem you can assume a circular orbit for which

[tex]v = \sqrt{\frac{\mu}{r}}[/tex] or [tex]v = \sqrt{\frac{G M}{r}}[/tex]

where M is the mass of the Earth + moon. Since the Earth's mass is larger than the moon's mass, we can approximate M to be = the mass of the Earth.

G is [tex]6.67300×10^{-11} m^{3} kg^{-1} s^{-2}[/tex] and r = semi-major axis = 384,399 km

Punch in the values for this and you obtain v = 1.018 km/s

The value from wiki is 1.022 km/s, which means we were only off by 0.39%
 
First off, I messed up my LaTeX in post #4. Corrected.

protonchain: A couple of points.

Astronomers rarely use G (and planetary masses) for the simple reason that G (and the planetary masses) are not very accurate. G is embarrassing one of the least well-known physical constants (5 decimal places of accuracy). On the other hand, the product G*M can be measured to a very high degree of precision. For example, we know G*M for the Sun to about 12 places of accuracy and for the Earth to about 9 places.

The other point: The Moon's mass is a significant fraction of the Earth's mass. Ignoring it will lead to inaccurate results. A better estimate of the Moon's orbital velocity with respect to the Earth is

[tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{\mu_E+\mu_M}{a_{M}}} = 1024.5\,\text{km}/\text{s}[/tex]To Solistics:
It looks like you are jumping in over your head. How old are you, and how much high a level have you reached in your physics education? Rather than jumping in like this, I suggest you start with Kepler's laws (google for that). Feel free to ask any questions.
 
D H said:
[tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{\mu_E+\mu_M}{a_{M}}} = 1024.5\,\text{km}/\text{s}[/tex]

Is that a misplaced decimal point? Because it's 1.02 km/s not 1000 km/s

Second of all my error was 0.39%, so I'm well within the limits and it's a good estimate.
 
Sorry, misplaced decimal (actually, extra k; that should have been m/s, not km/s). Too fast typing! And yes, it is a reasonably good estimate. Note that you cannot get much better than your estimate if you use G (rather than G*M).
 
  • #10
Solistics said:
I'm fairly new to astrophysics, but I'm genuienly interested on knowing how to calculate orbits. I've been trying to do so on my own but I just find myself extremely frustrated. :confused: I'm trying to figure out what orbital vectors are and how i can calculate them using known orbital parameters. If i can get over this hurdle i should be all set.:approve:

thanks.

P.S. any sites that are helpful (lists of equations, sources etc.) would be appreciated.

What bodies are you trying to calculate just the Earth and moon?
 
  • #11
thanks for the help everyone. I found my problem. It seems like I switched a number in the vis-visa equation, 1/r instead of 2/r. Stupid me :rolleyes:. That fixed it. Now my values are exactly like what http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/moonfact.html" said.

D H I'm interested in where you found the value of mu. At first i did what protonchain did M*G which gave my results a big difference from yours. Knowing how you got that would be great :cool:.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
9K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K