What are some sums of infinite series that are = to 'e'?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on various infinite series that converge to the mathematical constant 'e'. The well-known series 1 + 1/1! + 1/2! + 1/3! + ... converges to 'e', but participants explore additional representations, including the series defined by the function f(n) where f(0) = e and f(n) = 0 for n ≠ 0. The conversation highlights the lack of exhaustive research into new infinite series summing to 'e', suggesting that discovering faster-converging series could be valuable for computational purposes. Participants also express interest in the implications of calculating 'e' to trillions of decimal places and the potential for new mathematical insights.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of infinite series and convergence
  • Familiarity with the mathematical constant 'e'
  • Basic knowledge of factorial notation (n!)
  • Concept of mathematical functions and their definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced infinite series that converge to 'e'
  • Explore the implications of rapidly converging series in computational mathematics
  • Investigate the historical context and significance of 'e' in mathematics
  • Learn about numerical methods for calculating 'e' to high precision
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students in advanced mathematics, and anyone interested in the properties and representations of the constant 'e'.

mesa
Gold Member
Messages
694
Reaction score
36
We all know about the sum of the infinite series,

1 + 1/1! + 1/2! + 1/3! + ... to 1/inf! = e

What other series do we have that are equal to 'e'?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mesa said:
I honestly don't know how you guys find so much more on Wikipedia than I do...

Either way, that is an excellent list of 'infinite series', are there any others?
I like $$e=\sum_{n\geq 0}f(n),$$ where ##\displaystyle f(n)=\left\{\begin{matrix}e & \text{if } n=0 \\ 0 & \text{if } n\neq 0\end{matrix}\right.##. :-p
 
Mandelbroth said:
I like $$e=\sum_{n\geq 0}f(n),$$ where ##\displaystyle f(n)=\left\{\begin{matrix}e & \text{if } n=0 \\ 0 & \text{if } n\neq 0\end{matrix}\right.##. :-p

That's different... :)
 
Mandelbroth said:
I like $$e=\sum_{n\geq 0}f(n),$$ where ##\displaystyle f(n)=\left\{\begin{matrix}e & \text{if } n=0 \\ 0 & \text{if } n\neq 0\end{matrix}\right.##. :-p
Personally, I prefer $$e=\sum_{n\geq 0}f(n),$$ where ##\displaystyle f(n)=\left\{\begin{matrix}e & \text{if } n=1 \\ 0 & \text{if } n\neq 1\end{matrix}\right.##
 
So is this all of them, as in if someone found something else outside of these then it's new to maths?
 
mesa said:
So is this all of them, as in if someone found something else outside of these then it's new to maths?
Do you honestly think we know all of mathematics?

I'd venture to guess that there are at least SOME (*cough*SUM*cough*) other representations out there. :-p
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Mandelbroth said:
Do you honestly think we know all of mathematics?...

Nope, just trying to see if someone else has more information. Do you have recommendations on where to find out more on the subject such as books, websites, etc.?
 
  • #10
mesa said:
Nope, just trying to see if someone else has more information. Do you have recommendations on where to find out more on the subject such as books, websites, etc.?
That list is not exhaustive. There is, as far as I know, not much interest in simply finding new infinite series that add up to 'e,' except perhaps if a new series converges much more rapidly than a previously known series.
 
  • #11
Jorriss said:
That list is not exhaustive. There is, as far as I know, not much interest in simply finding new infinite series that add up to 'e,' except perhaps if a new series converges much more rapidly than a previously known series.

I would imagine that would be valuable from a computing standpoint. What's the current record, 10 trillion decimal places or something to that effect?
 
  • #12
mesa said:
I would imagine that would be valuable from a computing standpoint. What's the current record, 10 trillion decimal places or something to that effect?
In what sense valuable? I do not believe there is much interest in finding more decimal places to e beyond the novelty of having found new decimals - though someone more knowledgeable can certainly correct me.
 
  • #13
mesa said:
Do you have recommendations on where to find out more on the subject such as books, websites, etc.?

Why not concentrate on finding infinite series that sum to 1 and then multiply them by e? That would let you find series that sum to \pi or 42 or whatever.
 
  • #14
Jorriss said:
In what sense valuable? I do not believe there is much interest in finding more decimal places to e beyond the novelty of having found new decimals - though someone more knowledgeable can certainly correct me.


I find it remarkable we live in a time where we know a 1,000,000,000,000+ decimal places of 'e'. Euler and the like would probably be in awe of such an accomplishment.

Also I think figuring out new ways of calculating 'e' is important since it could help us gain new insight and lead to better maths in the future (much like it has proven to do so in the past).
 
  • #15
Stephen Tashi said:
Why not concentrate on finding infinite series that sum to 1 and then multiply them by e? That would let you find series that sum to \pi or 42 or whatever.

Brilliant!

$$e=e*2\sum_{n= 2}^{∞}(n-1)/((2)n!)$$
$$42=42*2\sum_{n= 2}^{∞}(n-1)/((2)n!)$$
$$pi=pi*2\sum_{n= 2}^{∞}(n-1)/((2)n!)$$
$$llama=llama*2\sum_{n= 2}^{∞}(n-1)/((2)n!)$$

Yes I 'cheated' with the 2 multiplier but so far I have only been able to derive an infinite sum to 1/2 and finals are calling...
These things fun!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K