What Are Tensors and Why Are They Important in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 7777777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensor
Click For Summary
Tensors are essential in physics, particularly in General Relativity, as they provide a framework for understanding complex relationships in multidimensional spaces. While some believe vectors are more fundamental, vectors are actually a specific type of tensor. The discussion highlights the importance of tensors in simplifying calculations, despite initial perceptions of their complexity. Understanding tensors requires a solid grasp of linear algebra and their transformation properties, which can be daunting for students. Ultimately, mastering tensors is crucial for advanced physics, and they significantly enhance computational efficiency in various applications.
  • #31
PSarkar said:
But then how is the definition coordinate free? You are forced to choose some coordinates in order to work with tensors.

This depends on what you mean by "work" and in what context but the definition is clearly coordinate-free. I would suggest you take a look at Roman's linear algebra text.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Will be the Laplacian, \bigtriangledown ^2, in actually, a Tensor?? Will be a simplification of Hessian tensor?
 
  • #33
Come think in 2D. Given 2 values, a and b, it's possible to associate a point P with coordinates (a, b) and trace a straight between the origem and the point P. Ready, we have a vector! So, analogously, given 4 values (a, b, c, d), should be possible to associate these values with straight, and, somehow associate a plane with this straight. This, geometrically, would be a tensor. I think...
 
  • #34
WannabeNewton said:
This depends on what you mean by "work" and in what context but the definition is clearly coordinate-free. I would suggest you take a look at Roman's linear algebra text.

Can you explain why the multilinear array definition is coordinate free as this is not obvious to me. If you need to choose coordinates to get the tensor, then the tensor depends on which coordinates you choose. You definitely cannot write one down without choosing coordinates. This definition misses the essence of tensor which is independent of any coordinate and so we should have a definition and representation without coordinates.

I think jgens answer about collecting all the coordinate representation of the tensors together make sense since it will no longer depend on the coordinates. But the down side is you still can't write one down without coordinates.
 
  • #35
PSarkar said:
Can you explain why the multilinear array definition is coordinate free as this is not obvious to me.

Sorry when you said "the definition" I thought you were referring to the usual algebraic definition of a tensor as this is what I take to be "the definition" of a tensor. I find it hard to look at anything relying on coordinate representations as a definition hence I agree that a definition in terms of coordinate components is archaic and inferior for the reasons stated by you and others.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
716
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K