What Are The Best Books To Study Cosmology?

  • Context: Cosmology 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Figaro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Cosmology
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around recommendations for books on cosmology suitable for undergraduate and graduate studies. Participants share their experiences with various texts and seek guidance on the best resources for self-study in cosmology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire for more comprehensive cosmology texts beyond what is offered in A. Zee's book, specifically asking about the suitability of "Cosmology" by Harrison and "Cosmology" by Roos for undergraduate studies.
  • Several participants recommend "Introduction to Cosmology" by Barbara Ryden, noting its accessibility and relevance for self-study.
  • There is a discussion about the publication dates of Ryden's and Roos' books, with some participants questioning whether the newer edition of Roos provides significant updates compared to Ryden's older edition.
  • One participant mentions the upcoming second edition of Ryden's book and asks for opinions on whether Roos or Ryden would be better for self-study.
  • Another participant shares their positive experience with Ryden's book but has not explored Roos' work, suggesting that waiting for the new edition of Ryden might be beneficial.
  • A participant suggests "The Mechanical Universe" by Goodstein as an additional resource.
  • Technical questions arise regarding specific equations from Baumann's lecture notes, with participants discussing the derivation of the comoving Hubble radius in the context of inflation and energy density relationships.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the value of "Introduction to Cosmology" by Barbara Ryden, but there is no consensus on whether Roos or Ryden is superior for self-study, as opinions vary based on personal experiences and the importance of updated content.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the impact of publication dates on the relevance of cosmology texts, and there are unresolved questions about specific mathematical derivations related to cosmological models.

Figaro
Messages
103
Reaction score
7
Hi, I'm currently in my last year of undergraduate degree, I have a basic knowledge of GR (A. Zee) but I have a very limited knowledge of cosmology, I did not cover the cosmology portion of Zee's book as it is too superficial and I don't want to waste my time reading that. I think my time will be better off at reading proper cosmology books. Based on my searches, Cosmology by Harrison is a good starter but is it an undergrad book or too easy in that respect? Is Cosmology by Roos good for undergrad? For grad school Dodelson? Can anybody guide me on the proper outline of books for cosmology?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I like "Introduction to Cosmology" by Barbara Ryden
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805389121/?tag=pfamazon01-20

and, at a little higher level, Daniel Baumann's lecture notes for a course that he taught at Cambridge
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/Cosmology/Lectures.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd and QuantumQuest
George Jones said:
I like "Introduction to Cosmology" by Barbara Ryden
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805389121/?tag=pfamazon01-20

and, at a little higher level, Daniel Baumann's lecture notes for a course that he taught at Cambridge
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/Cosmology/Lectures.pdf
Ryden's book was published in 2002, while Roos' have a 4th edition last (2015), do you think that is a major plus? 13 years seems to have a lot of change in Cosmology.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Figaro said:
Ryden's book was published in 2002, while Roos' have a 4th edition last (2015), do you think that is a major plus? 13 years seems to have a lot of change in Cosmology.

The Amazon page for Roos 4e has a "Look Inside" preview which includes the preface, which outlines the changes from the third edition.
 
I really liked Rydens book, I have not looked into Roos but I have the 3rd edition though. If you have the time to wait, then perhaps Ryden is the best?
 
malawi_glenn said:
I really liked Rydens book, I have not looked into Roos but I have the 3rd edition though. If you have the time to wait, then perhaps Ryden is the best?
Thanks for your suggestions but what is the standard outline in studying cosmology? From undergrad to grad.
 
u may read the mechanical universe by Goodstein
 
  • #10
George Jones said:
I like "Introduction to Cosmology" by Barbara Ryden
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0805389121/?tag=pfamazon01-20

and, at a little higher level, Daniel Baumann's lecture notes for a course that he taught at Cambridge
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/db275/Cosmology/Lectures.pdf
That is a very good lecture notes, but I have a question on page 31 equation (2.1.6) on inflation, since the energy density ##ρ(a)## and the scale ##a## is related by ##ρ(a) ∝ a^{-3(1+w)}##, he said that the comoving Hubble radius is given by (for a universe dominated by a fluid with constant equation of state)
##(aH)^{-1} = H_o^{-1} a^{\frac{1+3w}{2}}##. How did he get this relation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Figaro said:
That is a very good lecture notes, but I have a question on page 31 equation (2.1.6) on inflation, since the energy density ##ρ(a)## and the scale ##a## is related by ##ρ(a) ∝ a^{-3(1+w)}##, he said that the comoving Hubble radius is given by (for a universe dominated by a fluid with constant equation of state)
##(aH)^{-1} = H_o^{-1} a^{\frac{1+3w}{2}}##. How did he get this relation?

Multiply equation (1.3.136),
$$H = H_0 \sqrt{\Omega}a^{-\frac{3}{2} \left( 1 + w \right)},$$
by the scale factor ##a##, and note that for a (spatially) flat universe, ##\Omega = 1##.
 
  • #12
George Jones said:
Multiply equation (1.3.136),
$$H = H_0 \sqrt{\Omega}a^{-\frac{3}{2} \left( 1 + w \right)},$$
by the scale factor ##a##, and note that for a (spatially) flat universe, ##\Omega = 1##.
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K