Suggestion for cosmology overview

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around suggestions for general-background books on cosmology, focusing on the development and evolution of the universe. Participants share recommendations suitable for someone with a biophysics background looking for accessible reading material without heavy mathematical derivations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Nikolai seeks recommendations for cosmology books that are accessible and do not require extensive mathematical background.
  • Some participants suggest A. Liddle's 'An Introduction to Modern Cosmology' as a concise and accessible option, noting its simplicity and clarity.
  • Another recommendation is J. Silk's 'Big Bang', which is described as having a broader scope and being more narrative-driven, suitable for casual reading.
  • M. Lachieze-Rey's 'Cosmology: A First Course' is mentioned multiple times as a recommendation, though one participant questions its relevance due to being potentially outdated.
  • Concerns are raised about the age of Lachieze-Rey's book, with one participant noting it does not include recent observational data but still maintains valid theoretical concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the recommendations provided, but there is some disagreement regarding the relevance and currency of Lachieze-Rey's book, with differing views on whether its age significantly impacts its usefulness.

Contextual Notes

Some recommendations are based on personal experience with the texts, and there is an acknowledgment of the limitations of older publications in addressing recent developments in cosmology.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals with a background in physics or related fields seeking accessible resources to understand cosmology without delving into complex mathematical derivations.

Nikolai01
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if I could get suggestions for good general-background book on cosmology and the development/evolution of the universe. This is for myself, and I'll leave any more specifics to the topics open as I'd be look into whatever suggestions I receive. I'm a biophysicist, and back in undergrad (14 years ago, ack!) was a chemical physics major, with more of an emphasis in physics. I took modern physics and quantum back then, and remember it qualitatively if not quantitatively. I have a decent mathematical background, but this will be read during my down time and I probably won't want to be doing any hardcore derivations. :-) Thanks!

-Nikolai
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Liddle is a very accesible introduction :)
 
Try A. Liddle's 'An introduction to modern cosmology'.
It's short and concise (mere ~200 pages). The mathematical part is kept relatively simple and notations are clear. Advanced physics background is not required, as general relativity is mostly avoided.
In a pinch, you can even skim over the equations, and still retain reasonably good qualitative understanding of the material - although with your background that should not be a problem.

Another tentative recommendation is J. Silk's 'Big Bang'. I've only read it in fragments, hence the 'tentative' qualifier. From what I've seen, though, it has a much broader scope, including topics on localised evolution (stars, galaxies). Although technically a textbook, it is much more words than equations, the latter being relegated to appendices - it is arguably a better choice if you're looking for a more casual read, closer to what a popular science book would give you.
 
I recommend M. Lachieze-Rey, Cosmology: A First Course
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: smodak
Demystifier said:
I recommend M. Lachieze-Rey, Cosmology: A First Course
Amazon review says the book is quite outdated. Is it?
 
smodak said:
Amazon review says the book is quite outdated. Is it?
It is written in 1992, so it does not discuss the most recent observational data such as accelerated expansion and dark energy. But it does not contain claims which today would be considered wrong, and theoretical concepts considered there are not outdated at all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: smodak

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K