What Are the Best Online Courses for Finite Element and Numerical Methods?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the search for online courses related to Finite Element Method (FEM) and Numerical Methods, particularly for students seeking affordable options. Participants share resources and express their preferences for course structure and content.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests recommendations for online courses in FEM and Numerical Methods that are well-organized and affordable.
  • Several participants suggest searching MIT's OpenCourseWare for relevant courses, noting the availability of multiple options.
  • One participant expresses concern that the mathematical level of MIT's courses is too high for them, despite having studied differential equations, calculus, and linear algebra.
  • Another participant emphasizes the necessity of a solid background in differential equations and calculus for understanding FEM.
  • Participants discuss various numerical methods, including Euler method, Runge-Kutta, and methods for solving systems of linear equations, without reaching a consensus on the best approach for learning.
  • One participant mentions the desire for interactive online courses rather than traditional materials, indicating a preference for a more engaging learning experience.
  • Additional resources are shared, including links to alternative courses on Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations from different institutions.
  • There is a distinction made between modern and traditional approaches to understanding finite elements, with a suggestion that some may prefer practical problem-solving over theoretical generalizations.
  • Short books by Hinton and Owen are recommended for those interested in engineering applications of FEM.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of comfort with the mathematical rigor of available courses, indicating a lack of consensus on the appropriate level of complexity for learners. There are multiple competing views on the best resources and approaches to learning FEM and Numerical Methods.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of prior mathematical knowledge, while others express that the existing resources may not meet their learning preferences. The discussion reflects a range of backgrounds and expectations regarding course content and delivery.

tomcenjerrym
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am taking FINITE ELEMENT METHOD and NUMERICAL METHOD in this semester of my college and I am looking for any ONLINE COURSE on them, if available, at reasonable price (or student price). If anybody here can suggest me about it then it would be appreciated so much. I wonder if there available any online course of them, well-organized, sort, comfort, like I was learning in my boyhood.

Please advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Search Google with "MIT","OCW","finite element method" or "MIT","OCW","numerical methods"

MIT offers several options in their online courseware.
 
Search Google with "MIT","OCW","finite element method" or "MIT","OCW","numerical methods"

MIT offers several options in their online courseware.

I know, but, the mathematic level is too high for me. Thanks for the reply.
 
Finite element method is a numerical method for solving partial differential equations! If one is doing FEM, one needs exposure to differential equations and calculus.

What is one's background?
 
Finite element method is a numerical method for solving partial differential equations! If one is doing FEM, one needs exposure to differential equations and calculus.

What is one's background?
I’m not sure when you’re saying “What is one's background?”.
However, I already studied differential equations, calculus, and linear algebra in my college and I am an undergraduate student of Mechanical Engineering myself.
 
tomcenjerrym said:
I’m not sure when you’re saying “What is one's background?”.
However, I already studied differential equations, calculus, and linear algebra in my college and I am an undergraduate student of Mechanical Engineering myself.
You indicated that the math level was too high. So I wondered what level one had achieved.

Normally in learning numerical methods, one is exposed to solving differential equations and integrals numerically, e.g. Euler method or Runge-Kutta for diffEQ's ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_ordinary_differential_equations ) or trapezoidal rule, Simpson's rule for numerical integration ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_integration ).

Then there are systems of equations -
Much effort has been put in the development of methods for solving systems of linear equations. Standard direct methods i.e. methods that use some matrix decomposition are Gaussian elimination, LU decomposition, Cholesky decomposition for symmetric (or hermitian) and positive-definite matrix, and QR decomposition for non-square matrices. Iterative methods such as the Jacobi method, Gauss-Seidel method, successive over-relaxation and conjugate gradient method are usually preferred for large systems.

One can look at this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_partial_differential_equations

which leads to
16.920J / 2.097J / 6.339J Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations (SMA 5212), Spring 2003
http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Aeronautics-and-Astronautics/16-920JNumerical-Methods-for-Partial-Differential-EquationsSpring2003/CourseHome/index.htm

http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Aeronautics-and-Astronautics/16-920JNumerical-Methods-for-Partial-Differential-EquationsSpring2003/LectureNotes/index.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I already download that courses before and read the files within the folder. Still too high of mathematics levels to me. Actually, I am looking a kind of interactive online course. Thanks.
 
There are two ways into understanding finite elements. The "modern" way is to treat FE as an general method for finding piecewise-continuous approximate solutions to partial differential equations (which tends to look more like pure maths than engineering).

The more traditional way is to focus on specific, fairly simple, practical problems (e.g. stress analysis of frame structures) and show how all the parts of the FE method fit together in practice, without trying to generalize or worry to much about WHY it works. Maybe you want the second type of approach rather than the first.

I don't know about online courses, but there are some short books by Hinton and/or Owen (published by Pineridge Press) that talk mainly about engineering and computer programming, not about Hilbert spaces.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K