What are the complex eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a 2x2 rotation matrix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalue Matrix
Click For Summary
The 2x2 rotation matrix T has complex eigenvalues and eigenvectors, specifically λ = e^{±iθ}, with corresponding eigenvectors {1, -i} and {1, i}. Real eigenvalues only occur at specific angles θ = nπ, where n is an integer, reflecting that no vector in the xy-plane remains unchanged under rotation except for these angles. The matrix S, which diagonalizes T, is constructed as S = [1/2, i/2; 1/2, -i/2], and the similarity transformation STS^{-1} results in a diagonal matrix with eigenvalues e^{iθ} and e^{-iθ}. The discussion highlights the geometric interpretation of rotations in two dimensions compared to three dimensions, emphasizing the absence of real eigenvalues in the plane. Overall, the analysis effectively demonstrates the properties of the rotation matrix and its eigenvalues.
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



The 2x2 matrix representing a rotation of the xy-plane is T =

cos θ -sin θ
sin θ cos θ

Show that (except for certain special angles - what are they?) this matrix has no real eigenvalues. (This reflects the geometrical fact that no vector in the plane is carried into itself under such a rotation; contrast rotations in three dimensions.) This matrix does, however, have complex eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Find them. Construct a matrix S which diagonalises T. Perform the similarity transformation (STS-1) explicitly, and show hat it reduces T to diagonal form.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



The characteristic equation is [cos(θ) - \lambda]^{2}+ [sin^{2}θ] = 0, that is,
\lambda^{2} - 2 \lambda cos(θ) + 1 = 0. The discriminant for this equation is 2i sin(θ). This means that the matrix has real eigenvalues iff θ = nπ for all integers n.


The geometrical interpretation is that in the xy-plane, any arbitrary vector does not get mapped onto its original direction unless there is no rotation (θ = 0), the rotation is half a revolution (θ = ±180°), the rotation is a full revolution (θ = ±360°), ... . The vector (0,0) has a special status in this transformation as it gets mapped onto itself, however, by definition, (0,0) is not an eigenvector.

In three dimensions, again, any arbitrary vector does not get mapped onto its original direction unless there is no rotation (θ = 0), the rotation is half a revolution (θ = ±180°), the rotation is a full revolution (θ = ±360°), ... . The rotation is about a specified axis passing through the origin (the axis has to pass through the origin, otherwise the transformaion is not linear), and all the vectors that live in the axis have a special status in this transformation as they get mapped onto themselves, however, by definition, (0,0) is not an eigenvector, so all the vectors in the axis except for (0,0) are eigenvectors. This is in contrast to the vectors in a plane as such vectors do not exist in that case.



The eigenvalues are \lambda = e^{±iθ}. Substitute \lambda = e^{iθ} and eigenvector = {x,y} into the eigenvalue equation to obtain two equations which can be solved to obtain y = -ix. Then, substitute \lambda = e^{-iθ} and eigenvector = {x,y} into the eigenvalue equation to obtain two equations which can be solved to obtain y = ix. So, the eigenvalues are e^{iθ} and e^{-iθ} and the corresponding eigenvectors are {1, -i} and {1, i}.



The matrix S-1 is given by
1 1
-i i
From this, the matrix S is found to be
1/2 i/2
1/2 -i/2

Performing the similarity transformation (STS-1) explicitly results in the matrix
e^{iθ} 0
0 e^{-iθ}.



I would greatly appreciate any comments on the solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi failexam! :wink:

yes that's fine :smile:, except …

i] in 3D, there's an extra row and column, with a 1 and 0s, so there's an extra eigenvalue of 1 (and the question only asks about a plane anyway :wink:)

ii] you could divide by detS, so that both S and S-1 have 1/√2s, which would make the S and S-1 pair look more symmetric (but you don't have to, since the question doesn't ask for it)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K