What are the components of a vector field on a manifold?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of vector fields on manifolds, particularly focusing on the definitions and components of vector fields as presented in the book "Geometry, Topology and Physics" by Mikio Nakahara. Participants explore the nature of vector fields, their components, and the relationship between vectors and scalar fields in the context of smooth manifolds.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion regarding the definition of a vector field as a smooth assignment of vectors to points on a manifold, questioning the relationship between vector fields and their components.
  • It is proposed that the components of a vector field, in a coordinate system, are scalar fields rather than vectors, with examples provided to illustrate this distinction.
  • One participant suggests that the term "vector field at a point" is shorthand for referring to the specific vector that the vector field assigns at that point.
  • Another participant emphasizes that if the entire vector field is smooth, then the individual components of the vector field must also be smooth functions.
  • An example of a specific vector field is presented, illustrating how the components of the vector field can be expressed as scalar fields that map points in the plane to their respective vector components.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express confusion and seek clarification on the definitions and relationships involved, indicating that multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of vector fields and their components.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions of vector fields, the nature of their components, and the implications of smoothness in the context of manifolds. The discussion highlights varying interpretations of terminology and concepts without reaching a consensus.

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am not sure I understand the idea of vector field on a manifold. The book I read is Geometry, Topology and Physics by Mikio Nakahara. The way this is defined there is: "If a vector is assigned smoothly to each point on M, it is called a vector field over M". Thinking about the 2D Euclidean space, it would look like at each point there is a vector (tangent to a curve inside that manifold) pointing in a certain direction, going smoothly from a point to another. However, he says then that "each component of a vector field is a smooth function from M to R". I am not sure I understand why is this. The components of a vector field are the vectors and they map from F(M) to R, where F(M) is the set of all smooth functions on M and F(M) is not the same thing as M. Also he says that "A vector field X at p ##\in## M is denoted by ##X|_p##, which is an element of ##T_pM##". I am confused here, too. By the first definition, a vector field associates to each point in M a vector, in a smooth way. How can you have a vector field at a point, when you have just one vector at that point (I understand you can define the tangent vector space for every point, but this is not what we describe here, right?). Can someone clarify these for me please? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silviu said:
The components of a vector field are the vectors
I think the confusion may arise from this statement. The components of a vector field, with respect to a coordinate system, are not vectors but scalar fields. For instance, in the two-dimensional number plane with the usual Cartesian ( aka 'rectangular') coordinate system, the components of the vector field are two scalar fields, one that maps each point to the x coordinate of the vector at that point, and one that maps to the y coordinate.
Silviu said:
How can you have a vector field at a point
A reference to 'the vector field at a point' is just a loose shorthand for 'the vector that is the value of the vector field at that point'.
 
andrewkirk said:
I think the confusion may arise from this statement. The components of a vector field, with respect to a coordinate system, are not vectors but scalar fields. For instance, in the two-dimensional number plane with the usual Cartesian ( aka 'rectangular') coordinate system, the components of the vector field are two scalar fields, one that maps each point to the x coordinate of the vector at that point, and one that maps to the y coordinate.
A reference to 'the vector field at a point' is just a loose shorthand for 'the vector that is the value of the vector field at that point'.
Thank you for your reply. However I am still confused. In your first statement: based on the example you gave, if we take all the vectors in the xy plane to form a vector field, then the x and y coordinates are the component of a specific vector within that vector field, but the vector field, is still formed of vectors. I am not sure I understand what you mean.
 
Silviu said:
Hello! I am not sure I understand the idea of vector field on a manifold. The book I read is Geometry, Topology and Physics by Mikio Nakahara. The way this is defined there is: "If a vector is assigned smoothly to each point on M, it is called a vector field over M".
A vector field is an area of points with an attached vector at each of them. That they behave smoothly at those points makes sense, if one - as usual - wants to consider smooth maps and smooth manifolds. I think it should be defined without that condition and it should be mentioned explicitly if given, but without it you can't do very much with it. So smoothness comes in quite convenient and most physical applications are smooth manifolds. Continuity is normally required to be the least condition.
Thinking about the 2D Euclidean space, it would look like at each point there is a vector (tangent to a curve inside that manifold) pointing in a certain direction, going smoothly from a point to another. However, he says then that "each component of a vector field is a smooth function from M to R".
This refers to the coordinate functions of the vector. If the entire map ##p \mapsto X_p## is smooth, so are the single coordinates ##p \mapsto (X_p)_i = \left. \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}\right|_p##
I am not sure I understand why is this. The components of a vector field are the vectors and they map from F(M) to R, where F(M) is the set of all smooth functions on M and F(M) is not the same thing as M. Also he says that "A vector field X at p ##\in## M is denoted by ##X|_p##, which is an element of ##T_pM##". I am confused here, too. By the first definition, a vector field associates to each point in M a vector, in a smooth way. How can you have a vector field at a point, when you have just one vector at that point (I understand you can define the tangent vector space for every point, but this is not what we describe here, right?). Can someone clarify these for me please? Thank you!
If we have smooth functions, then we have tangent spaces as they are differentiable (by definition). Whether the tangent space is one-dimensional or of higher dimension depends on the function. In general, there is simply a tangent space attached to each point of differentiability, e.g. a plane if the function has two variables. In these cases, there is an entire tangent bundle attached, and a single vector only one tangent in a certain direction. So ##\{(p,T_pM)\,\vert \,p \in M\}## is called tangent bundle or short vector bundle. ##X_p \in T_pM## then denotes the directional derivative in direction ##X## at a point ##p##. So ##\{(p,X_p)\,\vert \,p \in M\}## is still a vector field, since it contains only tangents in direction of ##X##, but there are other tangents at ##p## if ##M## is of higher dimension than one.
 
An example may help. Consider the vector field ##\vec V:\mathbb R^2\to \mathbb R^2## such that ##\vec V(x,y)=-y\mathbf{\hat i} + x\mathbf{\hat j}## where ##\mathbb{\hat i}, \mathbb{\hat j}## are the unit vectors in the x and y directions. This is a vector field whose flow rotates around the origin at a rate that is proportional to the distance from the origin.

At a specific point ##(x',y')## the 'value' of the vector field is a single vector ##\vec V(x',y')=-y'\mathbf{\hat x} + x'\mathbf{\hat y}##, which has components ##-y'## and ##x'## in the usual basis. The vector field has two component fields, which are scalar fields ##V^1:\mathbb R^2\to \mathbb R## and ##V^2:\mathbb R^2\to \mathbb R## such that ##V^1(x,y)=-y## and ##V^2(x,y)=x##. The scalar field ##V^1## maps each point in the plane to the ##x## component of the value of the vector field at that point, and the scalar field ##V^2## maps each point in the plane to the ##y## component of the value of the vector field at that point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
8K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K