What Are the Conditions for a Quadratic Equation to Not Meet the X-Axis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conditions under which the quadratic equation \(y=ax^2+2bx+c\) does not intersect the x-axis. The key conclusion is that if the discriminant \(b^2 < ac\) holds, then the coefficients \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\) cannot be in arithmetic or geometric progression. The proof utilizes the AM-GM inequality to demonstrate that both cases lead to contradictions, confirming that \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\) can only be in harmonic progression.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic equations and discriminants
  • Familiarity with arithmetic, geometric, and harmonic progressions
  • Knowledge of the AM-GM inequality
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of quadratic equations and their discriminants
  • Learn more about the AM-GM inequality and its applications
  • Explore proofs involving contradictions in mathematical reasoning
  • Investigate the relationships between different types of progressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in algebraic proofs and the properties of quadratic functions.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93
Problem:

If the curve $y=ax^2+2bx+c$, ($a,b,c \,\in\,\mathbb{R},\,a,b,c \neq 0$) never meet the x-axis, then a,b,c can't be in

A)Arithmetic Progression

B)Geometric Progression

C)Harmonic Progression

D)All of these

Attempt:

Since, the curve never meets the x-axis, we have the condition that the discriminant of the quadratic is less than zero, hence,

$$b^2<ac$$

The above shows that a,b,c can't be in geometric progression. But the given answers are A and B, how do I show that they are not in arithmetic progression? :confused:

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Pranav said:
Problem:

If the curve $y=ax^2+2bx+c$, ($a,b,c \,\in\,\mathbb{R},\,a,b,c \neq 0$) never meet the x-axis, then a,b,c can't be in

A)Arithmetic Progression

B)Geometric Progression

C)Harmonic Progression

D)All of these

Attempt:

Since, the curve never meets the x-axis, we have the condition that the discriminant of the quadratic is less than zero, hence,

$$b^2<ac$$

The above shows that a,b,c can't be in geometric progression. But the given answers are A and B, how do I show that they are not in arithmetic progression? :confused:

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

Hey Pranav! ;)

If they were in arithmetic progression, you would have that:
$$b = \frac{a+c}{2}$$
Since $ac$ is greater than a square, $ac$ has to be positive, so we have:
$$\frac{a+c}{2}<\sqrt{ac}$$
According to the AM-GM inequality, this is a contradiction if $a$ and $c$ are both non-negative.
In the other case where $a$ and $c$ are both negative, we have:
$$\frac{(-a)+(-c)}{2}<\sqrt{(-a)(-c)}$$
which is again a contradiction according to the AM-GM inequality.
Therefore a,b,c can't be in arithmetic progression.

As for harmonic progression, let's try $a=1,b=\frac 1 2, c=\frac 1 3$.
That gives us:
$$\left(\frac 1 2\right)^2 < 1 \cdot \frac 1 3$$
Yep. A harmonic progression is possible. :)Oh, and even though my new year hasn't started yet, yours has.
So happy new year! (Party)
 
Last edited:
Hi ILS! :D

I like Serena said:
If they were in arithmetic progression, you would have that:
$$b = \frac{a+c}{2}$$
Since $ac$ is greater than a square, $ac$ has to be positive, so we have:
$$\frac{a+c}{2}<\sqrt{ac}$$
According to the AM-GM inequality, this is a contradiction.
Therefore a,b,c can't be in arithmetic progression.

Ah, I was thinking about a contradiction proof. Since this is an exam problem, I wonder if it would have hit me during the exam to check the other cases after looking at $b^2<ac$.

Thanks a lot! :)

Oh, and even though my new year hasn't started yet, yours has.
So happy new year! (Party)

Yes, its been two hours since midnight. Happy New Year! :)
 
Pranav said:
Hi ILS! :D

Ah, I was thinking about a contradiction proof. Since this is an exam problem, I wonder if it would have hit me during the exam to check the other cases after looking at $b^2<ac$.

Thanks a lot! :)

Btw, I have just edited my post, since we have to distinguish positive and negative cases.
(The AM-GM inequality has the condition that the numbers have to be non-negative.)
Yes, its been two hours since midnight. Happy New Year! :)
 
I like Serena said:
Btw, I have just edited my post, since we have to distinguish positive and negative cases.
(The AM-GM inequality has the condition that the numbers have to be non-negative.)

Yes, thanks a lot ILS! I really need to be careful with such case-checking problems. :o
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K