MHB What Are the Conditions for a Quadratic Equation to Not Meet the X-Axis?

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93
Problem:

If the curve $y=ax^2+2bx+c$, ($a,b,c \,\in\,\mathbb{R},\,a,b,c \neq 0$) never meet the x-axis, then a,b,c can't be in

A)Arithmetic Progression

B)Geometric Progression

C)Harmonic Progression

D)All of these

Attempt:

Since, the curve never meets the x-axis, we have the condition that the discriminant of the quadratic is less than zero, hence,

$$b^2<ac$$

The above shows that a,b,c can't be in geometric progression. But the given answers are A and B, how do I show that they are not in arithmetic progression? :confused:

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Pranav said:
Problem:

If the curve $y=ax^2+2bx+c$, ($a,b,c \,\in\,\mathbb{R},\,a,b,c \neq 0$) never meet the x-axis, then a,b,c can't be in

A)Arithmetic Progression

B)Geometric Progression

C)Harmonic Progression

D)All of these

Attempt:

Since, the curve never meets the x-axis, we have the condition that the discriminant of the quadratic is less than zero, hence,

$$b^2<ac$$

The above shows that a,b,c can't be in geometric progression. But the given answers are A and B, how do I show that they are not in arithmetic progression? :confused:

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

Hey Pranav! ;)

If they were in arithmetic progression, you would have that:
$$b = \frac{a+c}{2}$$
Since $ac$ is greater than a square, $ac$ has to be positive, so we have:
$$\frac{a+c}{2}<\sqrt{ac}$$
According to the AM-GM inequality, this is a contradiction if $a$ and $c$ are both non-negative.
In the other case where $a$ and $c$ are both negative, we have:
$$\frac{(-a)+(-c)}{2}<\sqrt{(-a)(-c)}$$
which is again a contradiction according to the AM-GM inequality.
Therefore a,b,c can't be in arithmetic progression.

As for harmonic progression, let's try $a=1,b=\frac 1 2, c=\frac 1 3$.
That gives us:
$$\left(\frac 1 2\right)^2 < 1 \cdot \frac 1 3$$
Yep. A harmonic progression is possible. :)Oh, and even though my new year hasn't started yet, yours has.
So happy new year! (Party)
 
Last edited:
Hi ILS! :D

I like Serena said:
If they were in arithmetic progression, you would have that:
$$b = \frac{a+c}{2}$$
Since $ac$ is greater than a square, $ac$ has to be positive, so we have:
$$\frac{a+c}{2}<\sqrt{ac}$$
According to the AM-GM inequality, this is a contradiction.
Therefore a,b,c can't be in arithmetic progression.

Ah, I was thinking about a contradiction proof. Since this is an exam problem, I wonder if it would have hit me during the exam to check the other cases after looking at $b^2<ac$.

Thanks a lot! :)

Oh, and even though my new year hasn't started yet, yours has.
So happy new year! (Party)

Yes, its been two hours since midnight. Happy New Year! :)
 
Pranav said:
Hi ILS! :D

Ah, I was thinking about a contradiction proof. Since this is an exam problem, I wonder if it would have hit me during the exam to check the other cases after looking at $b^2<ac$.

Thanks a lot! :)

Btw, I have just edited my post, since we have to distinguish positive and negative cases.
(The AM-GM inequality has the condition that the numbers have to be non-negative.)
Yes, its been two hours since midnight. Happy New Year! :)
 
I like Serena said:
Btw, I have just edited my post, since we have to distinguish positive and negative cases.
(The AM-GM inequality has the condition that the numbers have to be non-negative.)

Yes, thanks a lot ILS! I really need to be careful with such case-checking problems. :o
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top