What are the conditions for series convergence in terms of \Gamma_{2n+1}?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions for the convergence of a series involving the term \(\Gamma_{2n+1}\). Participants explore the implications of different forms of \(\Gamma_{2n+1}\) in the context of the series \(\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{(-1)^{n} \Gamma_{2n+1}}{(2n+1) r^{2n+1}}\), with considerations of the parameters \(m\) and \(r\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for the conditions on \(\Gamma_{2n+1}\) for the series to converge and whether there is an explicit expression for \(\Gamma_{2n+1}\) in terms of \(n\).
  • Another participant notes that the gamma function for positive integer arguments is equivalent to the factorial, suggesting a connection to \(\Gamma_{2n+1}\).
  • A different participant argues that \(\Gamma_{2n+1}\) may not relate to the gamma function and emphasizes that its form will depend on \(m\) and \(r\), indicating that more conditions may be necessary for a unique solution.
  • Examples of potential forms for \(\Gamma_{2n+1}\) are provided, including \(\Gamma_{2n+1} = 4 m r^{2n+1}\) and \(\Gamma_{2n+1} = 2(-1)^{n} m r^{2n+1} \frac{(2n+1)n!}{(2n+1)!}\), although the latter raises concerns about consistency with the notation.
  • Participants suggest using convergence tests, such as the ratio test and Leibniz's test, to analyze the series.
  • One participant claims to have resolved the issue by proposing \(\Gamma_{2n+1} = s^{2n+1}\) under the condition \(\frac{s}{r} < 1\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature and definition of \(\Gamma_{2n+1}\), with some proposing specific forms while others question the assumptions and conditions necessary for convergence. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact conditions for convergence and the appropriate form of \(\Gamma_{2n+1}\).

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the form of \(\Gamma_{2n+1}\) may depend on additional parameters and conditions, which are not fully specified. The discussion includes references to external sources for convergence tests, indicating that the mathematical steps and assumptions may require further clarification.

mmzaj
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
what are the conditions on [tex]\Gamma_{2n+1}[/tex] so as for the series to converge ?

[tex]m\pi=\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{(-1^{n}) \Gamma_{2n+1}}{(2n+1) r^{2n+1}}[/tex]

m = 0,1,2,...

r is real number

is there an explicit expression for [tex]\Gamma_{2n+1}[/tex] in terms of n ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The gamma function for positive integer arguments is essentially the same as factoral, i.e. gamma(n+1)=n!.
 
mathman said:
The gamma function for positive integer arguments is essentially the same as factoral, i.e. gamma(n+1)=n!.

[itex]\Gamma_{2n+1}[/itex] need not have anything to do with the gamma function! It's just a coefficient labelled with a capital gamma.

As for the form of gamma... it will obviously depend on m, and it will have to depend on r, too. I'm guessing that you'll need to add more conditions on the form you want, otherwise you may not get a unique answer. (And I don't know if you can get an answer independent of r).

(Following formulae lifted from wikipedia. check external reference to ensure correctness).

For instance,

[tex]\frac{\pi}{4} = \sum_{n=0}^\infty = \frac{(-1)^n}{2n+1}[/tex],

so we could to choose [itex]\Gamma_{2n+1} = 4 m r^{2n+1}[/itex].

Another series is

[tex]\frac{\pi}{2} = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{n!}{(2n+1)!}[/tex]

(where the (2n+1)! = 1*3*5*...(2n+1) ), so we could choose [itex]\Gamma_{2n+1} = 2(-1)^n m r^{2n+1} (2n+1)n!/(2n+1)![/itex]. (Admittedly, though, the factor of (-1)^n in there sort of breaks with the subscript notation of the coefficient).

As for general conditions on Gamma, I guess I would run through the convergence tests for series, like the ratio test. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratio_test
 
Last edited:
i think i sorted it out .

[tex]tan^{-1}(\frac{s}{r})=\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \frac{(-1^{n}) s^{2n+1} }{(2n+1) r^{2n+1}}[/tex]

where

[tex]\frac{s}{r}<1[/tex]

=> [tex]\Gamma_{2n+1} = s^{2n+1}[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K