What Are the Eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian with a Linear Term?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian that includes a linear term, specifically in the context of quantum mechanics. The Hamiltonian is given as \(\hat{H} = \hat{p}^2/2m + (1/2)m\omega^2\hat{x}^2 + F\hat{x}\), where \(F\) is a constant. Participants are exploring the implications of this Hamiltonian and its physical interpretation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the method of completing the square to simplify the Hamiltonian and explore its implications for eigenvalues. There are questions about the physical meaning of the linear term and how it affects the harmonic oscillator model. Some participants express confusion about the relationship between eigenfunctions and eigenvalues, and the role of constants added to the Hamiltonian.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with various participants providing insights and raising questions. Some have suggested methods for approaching the problem, such as using the ladder operator method, while others are clarifying concepts related to eigenfunctions and eigenvalues. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive lines of inquiry are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to the harmonic oscillator and the effects of adding constants to the Hamiltonian. There is an emphasis on understanding the implications of these changes on eigenvalues and eigenfunctions.

umagongdi
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the Hamiltonian

\hat{}H = \hat{}p2/2m + (1/2)mω2\hat{}x2 + F\hat{}x

where F is a constant. Find the possible eigenvalues for H. Can you give a physical
interpretation for this Hamiltonian?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I don't think you can put H in matrix form?

Can i use the following?
HΨ=λΨ

HΨ = p2Ψ/2m+(1/2)mω2x2Ψ+FxΨ = λΨ?
I think i am using the wrong method.

What does "give a physical interpretation..." mean?

thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Haha Russo still up to his tricks

you have to complete the square in the position operator terms to get a new position operator plus a constant term added onto the hamiltonian.

This added term means that it is a shifted harmonic oscillator
 
sgd37 said:
Haha Russo still up to his tricks

lol that's awsome that we went/go to the same uni, what do you do now Masters/PhD here?

As for the question, i don't understand how completing the square will help us find the eigenvalues.

Looking at

(1/2)mω2X2+ FX2

We can factorise the (1/2)mω2X2

(1/2)mω2X2(X2+FX/(1/2)mω2X2)

Looking at:

(X2+FX/(1/2)mω2X2)=(X+F/mω)2)-(F/mω2)2)

Subbing everything into original equation we get:

H=P2/2m +(1/2)mω2(X+F/mω2)2-(1/2)(F2/mω2)
 
Can we look at HΨ=?Ψ

We can rearrange and solve for Ψ?
 
Two things:

1. If you add a constant to the Hamiltonian, what does that do to the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues?

2. Initially you had the potential V(x) and now it looks like V(x+a), where a is a constant. Physically, what does x going to x+a represent? What effect should that have on the solutions?
 
I'm at Cambridge doing PartIII and missing the simple life at Queen Mary

anyway the Harmonic oscillator can be rearanged in terms of the number operator

\hat{H} = \frac {\hat{p}^2}{2m} +\frac {1}{2} m \omega^2 \hat{x}^2 = \hbar \omega (a^{\dagger} a +\frac {1}{2}) = \hbar \omega(\hat{n} + \frac{1}{2})

adding a constant to the hamiltonian does not change the eiegenstates only the eigenvalues
 
vela said:
Two things:

1. If you add a constant to the Hamiltonian, what does that do to the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues?

sgd37 said:
adding a constant to the hamiltonian does not change the eigenstates only the eigenvalues

In this case is the eigenfunction HΨ=EΨ or eigenstate, what is the difference, are they the same? I am a bit confused is the whole equation HΨ=EΨ called a eigenfunction or a specific part of it?

I think i finally understood how to do it, i used the ladder operator method. I obtained this part

\hat{H} = \frac {\hat{p}^2}{2m} +\frac {1}{2} m \omega^2 \hat{x}^2 = \hbar \omega (a^{\dagger} a +\frac {1}{2})<br /> <br /> I don&#039;t know how to do the following:<br /> <br /> \hbar \omega (a^{\dagger} a +\frac {1}{2}) = \hbar \omega(\hat{n} + \frac{1}{2})<br /> <br /> Finally starting to understand QM, thanks you guys.
 
Last edited:
the equation \hat{H} \Psi = E \Psi is used to define the eigenfinction \Psi with eigenvalues E

as for the number operator we derive that from the fact that

a \left| n \right \rangle = \sqrt{n} \left| n-1 \right \rangle

a^{\dagger} \left| n \right \rangle = \sqrt{n+1} \left| n+1 \right \rangle

these come from the conditions

a \left| 0 \right \rangle = 0

a^{\dagger} \left| 0 \right \rangle \propto \left| 1 \right \rangle

and from the fact that we want the number operator to reproduce the eigenvalues of the QHO i.e. \hbar \omega (n + 1/2)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K