What Are the Implications of Megaupload Being Taken Down?

  • Thread starter Thread starter genericusrnme
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of Megaupload's shutdown, exploring opinions on whether it was justified and what the future holds for similar platforms. Participants discuss the impact on users, the legality of Megaupload's operations, and the broader context of online piracy and copyright enforcement.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express sadness over Megaupload's shutdown and speculate on which service might be next, suggesting that alternatives will emerge.
  • Concerns are raised about the fate of subscribers who paid for premium services, with some arguing that their payments are now wasted.
  • Participants note that while Megaupload had legitimate uses, it was also associated with piracy, leading to a debate about the appropriateness of its shutdown.
  • Some argue that the site's closure was justified due to alleged involvement in serious criminal activities, including money laundering.
  • Others question whether the shutdown was primarily due to piracy or other illegal activities, indicating uncertainty about the motivations behind the action.
  • There are discussions about the effectiveness of current laws regarding e-crime and the role of media companies in facilitating or combating piracy.
  • Several participants suggest that improving the convenience and accessibility of legal purchasing options could reduce piracy.
  • Some express frustration with the current media business model, arguing it is outdated and contributes to piracy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether Megaupload's shutdown was justified. There are multiple competing views regarding its legality, the implications for users, and the effectiveness of current anti-piracy measures.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various aspects of Megaupload's operations, including its use for legitimate purposes and its alleged criminal activities, without resolving the complexities of these claims. The discussion reflects a range of opinions on the intersection of legality, ethics, and user rights in the digital age.

genericusrnme
Messages
618
Reaction score
2
Yep, megaupload has been taken down..
Who do you guys suppose is next?
Do you think that megaupload should have been taken down?

What's everyone's opinions on this matter?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
genericusrnme said:
Yep, megaupload has been taken down..
Who do you guys suppose is next?
Do you think that megaupload should have been taken down?

What's everyone's opinions on this matter?

Since almost everything starts with google... Google down might do some damages.
Well that's sad about megaupload. What do I think? Another website will born to replace megaupload.
 
fluidistic said:
Since almost everything starts with google... Google down might do some damages.
Well that's sad about megaupload. What do I think? Another website will born to replace megaupload.

There are already many alternatives.

What will happen to the subscribers who paid money for faster access (I'm not one of them)?
 
Nothing happens to the subscribers with paid accounts I'm affraid, if they payed for one recently it's pretty much just wasted money

There are already many alternitives but what's to stop them going down?
I personally have used megaupload to send music (that I myself wrote and recorded with free software and hardware that I owned), upload notes so I could download them somewhere else if I didn't have a usb stick handy
I get that megaupload can be used for piracy but attacking the site over it doesn't seem like the correct thing to do since it does have plenty of legit uses..
It's a shame those legit uses can just be handwaved away as secondary to piracy.
 
One of the founders was arrested in Auckland, New Zealand today.

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/248445/anonymous_retaliates_for_megaupload_shutdown_attacks_doj_others.html

http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/top-stories/12665254/who-is-kim-dotcom/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
genericusrnme said:
Nothing happens to the subscribers with paid accounts I'm affraid, if they payed for one recently it's pretty much just wasted money

There are already many alternitives but what's to stop them going down?
I personally have used megaupload to send music (that I myself wrote and recorded with free software and hardware that I owned), upload notes so I could download them somewhere else if I didn't have a usb stick handy
I get that megaupload can be used for piracy but attacking the site over it doesn't seem like the correct thing to do since it does have plenty of legit uses..
It's a shame those legit uses can just be handwaved away as secondary to piracy.
If they are allowing illegal activities, of course they will be shut down. You can't be "half" legal.
 
Megaupload was involved in some very serious money laundering schemes and should have been shut down.
 
omg, i have lots of photo backups on MU :rolleyes:
 
encorp said:
Megaupload was involved in some very serious money laundering schemes and should have been shut down.
Were they shut down for money laundering or facilitating the pirating of movies and music?
 
  • #10
genericusrnme said:
Do you think that megaupload should have been taken down?
Depends. If it was for facilitating the pirating of movies and music, then no. I don't consider that a serious enough problem that the DOJ should be spending public resources on it. On the other hand, the people arrested (who control megaupload) might have been involved in more sinister stuff.
 
  • #11
Good riddance that they are gone, I do think they crossed some boundaries. I am a bit concerned that there was some foul play between UMG and the authorities, considering UMG's history with MegaUpload.

IMO it's *way* too easy to pirate things. I think this comes from: a lack of sensible laws regarding e-crime, and a refusal by the major media companies to provide more modern services. The biggest blow to video game piracy to this day has been Steam, and the biggest blow to movie piracy Netflix. It's simply so much more convenient to pirate something than to actually pay for it.
 
  • #12
KingNothing said:
Good riddance that they are gone, I do think they crossed some boundaries. I am a bit concerned that there was some foul play between UMG and the authorities, considering UMG's history with MegaUpload.

IMO it's *way* too easy to pirate things. I think this comes from: a lack of sensible laws regarding e-crime, and a refusal by the major media companies to provide more modern services. The biggest blow to video game piracy to this day has been Steam, and the biggest blow to movie piracy Netflix. It's simply so much more convenient to pirate something than to actually pay for it.

This. The best way to end piracy is to make it more convenient to buy the product. Let's say you buy a game today. You're very likely to deal with ridiculous DRM or perhaps get to have fun with rootkits getting installed on your computer. It's as you said, Steam is just so easy that people tend to use it. Why risk going to jail when you can spend a few bucks and get the game instantly, downloaded to your computer, and you can use it at any time? Hell, some games are put online, that is, the entire data is online, so that you can access them from any computer. Now that's genius.

As for Megaupload, well, it's one site down. Pirates will find another one, and paying customers are shafted. But hey, I can't say that what they're doing is legal. Arresting them was the right thing to do... assuming that WAS the intent.
 
  • #13
Never heard of megaupload before today.

Interesting.

FBI.gov said:
Justice Department Charges Leaders of Megaupload with Widespread Online Copyright Infringement
WASHINGTON—Seven individuals and two corporations have been charged in the United States with running an international organized criminal enterprise allegedly responsible for massive worldwide online piracy of numerous types of copyrighted works through Megaupload.com and other related sites, generating more than $175 million in criminal proceeds and causing more than half a billion dollars in harm to copyright owners, the U.S. Justice Department and FBI announced today.

This action is among the largest criminal copyright cases ever brought by the United States and directly targets the misuse of a public content storage and distribution site to commit and facilitate intellectual property crime.

Personally, I'd have used some of the profits to get a face transplant...

Kim.Schmitz.n.u.no.who.2012.01.19.jpg

Kim Schmitz, founder of megaupload & u-know-who​

Sorry. I hate Rush Limbaugh. And if you look like him, I will kill you. (the http://www.hulu.com/watch/317024/saturday-night-live-chantix is STILL wearing off.)
 
  • #14
Char. Limit said:
This. The best way to end piracy is to make it more convenient to buy the product.

Yep. The internet makes it so easy, I can't for the life of me understand why more companies aren't making it more convenient to purchase the legitimate product. Downloading pirated stuff is still a bit of a chore, and there's no guarantee of quality.

Also, I am sick to death of watching my DVDs and having to sit through 5 minutes of YOU WOULDN'T STEAL A CAR, YOU WOULDN'T STEAL A PURSE, DOWNLOADING IS STEALING. Hello? I'm watching the DVD, if I downloaded it, I wouldn't have to see this, it's the first thing the pirates remove! Stop harassing paying customers, or pretty soon, I'm just going to stop buying this crap and start downloading a better product!

Make it super easy, make it super cheap, move units in high volume, it's not rocket surgery. Sell a collectors edition hard copy with added value (extras, commentary, t-shirt, whatever).

Why is it so hard to realize that the current business model for media is mired in the past? >.<

Also, you know what I download? Documentaries and really old movies that I can't find on DVD, or I can, but they are region coded or NTSC format and there's only so many hoops I can be bothered jumping through. There's a market for this stuff, realize this, and sell products to me!
 
  • #15
Adyssa said:
Why is it so hard to realize that the current business model for media is mired in the past? >.<

I couldn't agree more, those companies have been resisting the revolution of downloading products. By not supplying a demand they've damaged their own products. What if all the "lost money" had been spent in making an infrastructure for legal downloads?
 
  • #16
The long term issue with piracy is that it damages returns to the various entertainment industries (movies, music games). That means too much IP theft eventually leads to not-enough entertainment being produced.

We don't seem to be suffering any kind of lack of entertainment, so it seems unlikely to me that piracy is a tremendous problem. The resources it would take to effectively police information would be astronomical, and almost certainly not worth it.

I'm more concerned that we've gone the other way- our IP/copyright laws are far too restrictive. Pretty much nothing new has entered the public domain in my lifetime, and some things have even been removed.
 
  • #17
I always find it odd that people think that it's okay to steal something just because they don't like the costs and ways something are sold.

If you don't like it, don't buy it. It's entertainment, not water and bread.
 
  • #18
Adyssa said:
Why is it so hard to realize that the current business model for media is mired in the past? >.<

This hits it right on the nail. I have said this to myself 100 times over. Companies need to learn to adapt to the changing world and not fight against it.
 
  • #19
GregJ said:
This hits it right on the nail. I have said this to myself 100 times over. Companies need to learn to adapt to the changing world and not fight against it.
I don't like the car buying process, so I think I'll just steal my next car off the lot. Their fault, not mine.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
ThomasT said:
Depends. If it was for facilitating the pirating of movies and music, then no. I don't consider that a serious enough problem that the DOJ should be spending public resources on it.
What is your criteria for deciding if it serious enough for the DOJ to get into?
 
  • #21
Legality reflects culture. Culture is changing regarding copyright and IP in general.
We are merely in a transition period.

How long the transition will last - ?
What the IP world will look like after - ?The main reason music companies (biggest group on the offensive) are playing this up is that they have seen the writing on the wall. They are basically the middle man, who's role of production marketing and distribution is becoming obsolete in the long term.Adapt or Die.
 
  • #22
russ_watters said:
I don't like the car buying process, so I think I'll just steal my next car off the lot. Their fault, not mine.

Say you own a car dealership and most of your cars gets stolen no matter how high and secure you build the walls around your property (nothing you build/add helps in any way). You're constantly losing money.

Do you not think it is time to adapt a new sales method that may reduce the amount of theft (as clearly the current method is not working)?Edit: Don't get me wrong. I am not supporting piracy.
 
  • #23
Megaupload is just one of a whole load of file-hosting sites (Rapidshare, filefactory, mediafire etc etc... the list is very long) that clearly make most of their money off subscribers who pay to download pirated content. This is striking to me, it shows that people are willing to pay for content. Just not at the prices of iTunes and other legitimate sources.

I imagine that if megaupload had been more proactive in deleting illegal files and hadn't been so noisy about their shady dealings they would never have been arrested. The execs of all the file-hosting sites must know where all their content and money is coming from and that they are providing a service to piracy. However, by simply doing the very minimum required by the law, they get away with it and still make a bomb. Seems to me like megaupload simply weren't very smart.
 
  • #24
Pengwuino said:
I always find it odd that people think that it's okay to steal something just because they don't like the costs and ways something are sold.

If you don't like it, don't buy it. It's entertainment, not water and bread.

russ_watters said:
I don't like the car buying process, so I think I'll just steal my next car off the lot. Their fault, not mine.

No, it's not like that.

You two both do point out the core: if you don't like it, don't buy it. That's exactly what's happening. The companies are not adapting to a changing world and as a result people are not buying their products anymore. Some people who don't like to buy still use the product, but that doesn't change the fact that no money comes into the drawer.

I don't like the car-buying process, so I don't have a car. I still commute from A to B and sit in cars. I see absolutely no need to steal a car, because I can get around fine without one. It's the car company's loss, because their business model is faulty.

I feel the entertainment industry needs to scratch behind their ears and wonder why people are not buying and how they could turn around that process. Alternative solutions are coming on the market, but it is still very sparse (at least in my area).
 
  • #25
According to the news.
Other material found uploaded included child pornography and terrorism propaganda videos, according to the indictment. The U.S. government's investigation began in March 2010.

http://news.yahoo.com/u-shutters-megaupload-com-hackers-retaliate-011423326.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #26
People, stop calling piracy stealing, it's not the same morally, it's note the same legally.

As it relates to movies and such, I don't know, but when it comes to music, piracy is a part of the future and it actually makes sense in the time we live in. Ask musicians you know, the majority actually doesn't mind it because they realize it's an excellent way to get your music across (a person like Nick Drake died unappreciated 30 years back, but if he had started nowadays he would have gotten the fame he deserved). Musicians now make their money through other venues, and personally I can say that I would buy the CD if I really liked the music, irrelevant to having it on my computer from someone else or not.

Disclaimer: but anyway I don't know the reasons for the shutting down of megaupload, I'm just talking about the piracy part.
 
  • #27
If someone rents a car from a rental company and uses it to make drug deals, should the rental company be shut down? I think the person who makes the drug deals should be held responsible. Surely it is in the regulations that it can't be used for illegal activities (isn't it somewhere in the iTunes guidelines that you can't use the software for terrorist activities and such?).
 
  • #28
russ_watters said:
I don't like the car buying process, so I think I'll just steal my next car off the lot. Their fault, not mine.

Nice strawman. Highly irrelevant, as no one's suggesting piracy is okay, but very nice strawman you have there.
 
  • #29
Char. Limit said:
Nice strawman. Highly irrelevant, as no one's suggesting piracy is okay, but very nice strawman you have there.

Might want to go back and read a couple posts ;)
 
  • #30
Pengwuino said:
Might want to go back and read a couple posts ;)

I don't see the person he's quoting talking about how piracy is okay. He just says that businesses need to change their business model if they want to fight a comprehensive effort against piracy. I guess that's forbidden speech now?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K