What Are the Possible Equilibrium States in Tank Systems Using a Ratio Approach?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibria Range
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining possible equilibrium states in tank systems using the equations Q^E_1 = 6(9q_1 + q_2) and Q^E_2 = 20(3q_1 + 2q_2). By analyzing the ratio of these two equilibrium equations, specifically through the substitution of q_1 and q_2 values, the range of equilibrium states is established as 10/9 ≤ Q^E_2/Q^E_1 ≤ 20/3. The ratio approach is essential for identifying extrema and understanding the bounds of equilibrium states, although it does not provide specific values for q_1 and q_2. Further clarification is sought on the significance of the ratio and methods for determining exact equilibrium states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of equilibrium equations in fluid dynamics
  • Familiarity with ratio analysis in mathematical modeling
  • Basic knowledge of substitution methods in algebra
  • Concept of extrema in mathematical functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of equilibrium equations in tank systems
  • Learn about ratio analysis in mathematical modeling techniques
  • Explore methods for finding exact solutions in nonlinear equations
  • Study the implications of extrema in optimization problems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, mathematicians, and researchers involved in fluid dynamics and system optimization will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in equilibrium analysis in tank systems.

MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Given two equilibrium equations for a tank 1 and tank 2 with ## Q^E_1 =6(9q_1 +q_2) ## and ## Q^E_2 =20(3q_1 +2q_2) ##, respectively, where ## q_1, q_2 ≧ 0 ##, describe which possible equilibrium states for various values of ## q_1 ## and ## q_2 ## are possible.

I believe I know how the answer was derived, but would like an explanation, if possible.

What was done was:

Take ## \frac {Q^E_2}{Q^E_1} ## and then substitute ## q_1 = 0 ## to find one extrema, and then ## q_2 = 0 ## for another extrema. This yielded ## \frac {10}{9} ≤ \frac {Q^E_2}{Q^E_1} ≤ \frac {20}{3} ##. Now I understand the logic used somewhat (i.e. use the minimum values of q1 and q2 to to see where the maximum and minimum of the possible equilibria states lie), but why exactly is the ratio taken? Are not specific values for the equilibrium states wanted as per the question? How exactly does the ratio reveal the specific min and max for the equilibrium states? How do we know there is no higher or lower value for the equilibrium if ## q_1, q_2 ≠ 0 ##?

I feel like I am missing something here and any clarification would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When just trying to "describe" the equilibrium states, is the ratio sufficient? Does the ratio have any particular meaning?

Also, is there a way to find the exact equilibrium states as opposed to a ratio?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K