Capacitor: surface charge densities

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a capacitor with a top plate charged with 2Q and a bottom plate charged with -Q. Participants are tasked with finding the surface charge densities of all four surfaces and the electric fields in various regions around the capacitor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between surface charge densities and electric fields, questioning the assumptions made in the original poster's derivation. Some suggest using Gauss's Law and conservation of charge to derive equations related to the charge densities.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, with some participants providing guidance on how to approach the electric field calculations and the implications of surface charge densities. There is an ongoing exchange of ideas, and while some equations have been proposed, no consensus has been reached on the final solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the inner plates should have equal but opposite charge densities, and the outer plates will have the same charge densities. There is also mention of constraints related to the assumptions about the arrangement of charges and the application of Gauss's Law.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Given a capacitor, top plate with charge 2Q, bottom plate -Q: Find surface charge densities of all four surfaces and E-fields everywhere.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



34eaqkx.png


I start off with the general case of top plate having charge Q1, bottom plate Q2. Inner surfaces of capacitor get their charge densities distorted more. (Zero distortion when plates are very far away; equal charge distributed on inner and outer surfaces)

Inner and outer top surfaces charge density distorted by sigma, while bottom inner and outer surfaces distorted by gamma\sigma_1 = \frac{Q_1}{2A} - \delta, E_1 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{2A} - \delta)
\sigma_2 = \frac{Q_1}{2A} + \delta, E_2 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q1}{2A} + \delta)
\sigma_3 = -\frac{Q_2}{2A} - \gamma, E_3 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(-\frac{Q2}{2A} - \gamma)
\sigma_4 = -\frac{Q_2}{2A} + \gamma, E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(-\frac{Q2}{2A} + \gamma)

Electric fields at regions

E_A = -E_1 - E_2 + E_3 + E_4 = \frac {1}{2\epsilon_0}(-\frac{Q_1}{A}-\frac{Q_2}{A})
E_B = E_1 - E_2 + E_3 + E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(-2\delta -\frac{Q_2}{A}) = 0
E_C = E_1 + E_2 + E_3 + E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{A}-\frac{Q_2}{A})
E_D = E_1 + E_2 -E_3 + E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{A} + 2\gamma) = 0
E_E = E_1 + E_2 - E_3 - E_4 = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{Q_1}{A} + \frac{Q_2}{A})

Answers
\sigma_1 = \frac{Q}{2A}, E_1 = \frac{Q}{4A\epsilon_0}
\sigma_2 = \frac{3Q}{2A}, E_2 = \frac{3Q}{4A\epsilon_0}
\sigma_3 = \frac{3Q}{2A}, E_3 = \frac{3Q}{4A\epsilon_0}
\sigma_4 = \frac{-Q}{2A}, E_4 = \frac{-Q}{4A\epsilon_0}

These answers are wrong, as the inner plates should have equal but opposite charge densities, the outer plates will have exactly same charge densities. I checked similar questions online.

I'm guesssing the charge densities should be (from top to bottom surfaces): +1/2, +3/2, -3/2, +1/2.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
unscientific said:

Homework Statement



Given a capacitor, top plate with charge 2Q, bottom plate -Q: Find surface charge densities of all four surfaces and E-fields everywhere.I'm guesssing the charge densities should be (from top to bottom surfaces): +1/2, +3/2, -3/2, +1/2.

Your guess is correct, but I can not follow your derivation. The electric field of a surface charge on a metal surface is σ/ε0 outward, not the half.

Imagine you have 2Q charge arranged evenly along a plane at the position of the upper plate of the capacitor, and -Q charge along a plane at he position of the bottom plate. Determine the electric field above the planes, between them and below.

If you know the electric fields you can place the plates of the capacitor back. You know that the surface charge density on a metal surface is equal to ε0E. Knowing E, you can determine the surface charge densities at both sides of both capacitor plates.
 
ehild said:
Your guess is correct, but I can not follow your derivation. The electric field of a surface charge on a metal surface is σ/ε0 outward, not the half.

Imagine you have 2Q charge arranged evenly along a plane at the position of the upper plate of the capacitor, and -Q charge along a plane at he position of the bottom plate. Determine the electric field above the planes, between them and below.

If you know the electric fields you can place the plates of the capacitor back. You know that the surface charge density on a metal surface is equal to ε0E. Knowing E, you can determine the surface charge densities at both sides of both capacitor plates.

I tried that, didn't work:

Gauss's Law on inner plates:
\frac{\sigma_2}{2\epsilon_0} = \frac{-\sigma_3}{2\epsilon_0}

Conservation of Charge on plates:
A(\sigma_1 + \sigma_2) = 2Q
A(\sigma_3 + \sigma_4) = -QI only end up with 3 equations..
 
Last edited:
ehild said:
Your guess is correct, but I can not follow your derivation. The electric field of a surface charge on a metal surface is σ/ε0 outward, not the half.

Imagine you have 2Q charge arranged evenly along a plane at the position of the upper plate of the capacitor, and -Q charge along a plane at he position of the bottom plate. Determine the electric field above the planes, between them and below.

If you know the electric fields you can place the plates of the capacitor back. You know that the surface charge density on a metal surface is equal to ε0E. Knowing E, you can determine the surface charge densities at both sides of both capacitor plates.

I have come up with another equation, by trial and error -- Consider the field inside the top plate = 0

Case 1: top outer surface (-), bottom outer surface (+)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

Case 2: top outer surface (+), bottom outer surface (-)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

Case 3: top outer surface (+), bottom outer surface (+)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

Case 4: top outer surface (-), bottom outer surface (-)
\sigma_1 - \sigma_2 - \sigma_3 -\sigma_4 = 0

They all give the same relation. This equation with the three above, we can solve for them.
 
Try to work with the field lines. Every positive charge q is the source of q/ε0 field lines, and every negative, -q charge is the sink of q/ε0 field lines.

Imagine two planar arrangement of charges, 2Q on the upper plane and -Q on the bottom plane. Apply the method of superposition. Both planes contribute to the field in every domain A, B ,C and the net field is the sum of these contributions.
You have 2Q/ε0 field lines, emerging from the upper plane symmetrically at both sides of the plane, both upward and downward. Take upward positive. The downward field lines penetrate to both B and C. So the upper plane contributes to the electric field in domain A with Q/(Aε0) , and with -Q/(Aε0) between the planes (B) and also in domain C.
The other, negative plane of charges contributes to the field with Q/(2Aε0) in domain C, and with -Q/(2Aε0) in both B and A.

Adding these contributions, you get:

EA=Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=1/2 Q/(Aε0)

EB=-Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=-3/2 Q/(Aε0)

EC...

Can you proceed?

Now you place the metal plates in the position of the planes - it does not change the fields in A, B, C. The magnitude of the surface charge density is |E|ε0 on each surfaces.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • fieldlines.JPG
    fieldlines.JPG
    12.7 KB · Views: 681
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
ehild said:
Try to work with the field lines. Every positive charge q is the source of q/ε0 field lines, and every negative, -q charge is the sink of q/ε0 field lines.

Imagine two planar arrangement of charges, 2Q on the upper plane and -Q on the bottom plane. Apply the method of superposition. Both planes contribute to the field in every domain A, B ,C and the net field is the sum of these contributions.
You have 2Q/ε0 field lines, emerging from the upper plane symmetrically at both sides of the plane, both upward and downward. Take upward positive. The downward field lines penetrate to both B and C. So the upper plane contributes to the electric field in domain A with Q/(Aε0) , and with -Q/(Aε0) between the planes (B) and also in domain C.
The other, negative plane of charges contributes to the field with Q/(2Aε0) in domain C, and with -Q/(2Aε0) in both B and A.

Adding these contributions, you get:

EA=Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=1/2 Q/(Aε0)

EB=-Q/(Aε0)-Q/(2Aε0)=-3/2 Q/(Aε0)

EC...

Can you proceed?

Now you place the metal plates in the position of the planes - it does not change the fields in A, B, C. The magnitude of the surface charge density is |E|ε0 on each surfaces.

ehild

I have solved it using the four equations above, thank you very much for your help too!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
474
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K