WhoWee
- 219
- 0
Al68 said:I think the short answer is that the economy would be much stronger, with a higher standard of living in general, if neither individuals nor government could overextend themselves by using too much (unsecured) credit.
Secured debt is completely different, since it results in net positive wealth creation instead of a drain on future wealth creation.
And government borrowing/spending is especially problematic because it uses as collateral an assumed future ability and willingness to confiscate private wealth that hasn't yet been created.
This is the concept that EVERY business student understands, but politicians don't - there are no guarantees of future revenue or earnings.
Politicians now talk about $Trillion spending bills as though it's ordinary. Worse yet, they increase spending in the middle of a recession they label as the worst since the Great Depression. For some reason they also believe every dollar spent is "stimulative" - maybe they haven't seen any of the scandal doumentaries on wasted spending? On the other hand, maybe they don't realize their cash flow decreases unless they borrow during these periods? That would be bad (if they don't know IRS collections are down).
There isn't a business on the planet that runs in such a way (and stays in business) s typically the business managers are fired (or prosecuted).
