What Are the Predicted Bond Angles in Methanol?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjoyful
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Bonds
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on predicting bond angles in methanol (CH3OH) based on its Lewis structure. Participants explore the implications of molecular geometry, specifically focusing on the hydrogen-to-carbon-to-hydrogen and hydrogen-to-oxygen-to-carbon bond angles, while also addressing the limitations of Lewis structures in representing molecular shape.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant predicts the hydrogen-to-carbon-to-hydrogen bond angle to be 109.5 degrees based on a tetrahedral model.
  • Another participant suggests that the presence of the oxygen atom affects the bond angles, prompting further investigation into its positioning.
  • There is uncertainty about whether the hydrogen-to-oxygen-to-carbon bond angle would be less than or greater than 105 degrees, with some participants proposing values around 107.3 or 109 degrees.
  • Participants discuss the influence of lone pairs on the oxygen atom and how they might affect the bond angles, comparing them to the bond angles in water.
  • Confusion arises regarding the exact bond angle values, with some participants suggesting it could be 107.5 or 109 degrees, leading to further clarification attempts.
  • Additional topics arise regarding bond angles in isomers of isooctane and cycloalkanes, with some participants noting that different structures could lead to varying bond angles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the exact bond angles in methanol, with no consensus reached on whether the angles are closer to 107.5 or 109 degrees. The discussion also introduces competing ideas regarding the bond angles in isomers, indicating a lack of agreement on that topic as well.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the limitations of Lewis structures in depicting molecular shape, highlighting that while they show connectivity, they do not accurately represent three-dimensional geometry. The discussion also reflects varying levels of understanding and knowledge among participants.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying molecular geometry, particularly those interested in organic chemistry and the implications of molecular structure on bond angles.

bjoyful
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Write a Lewis structure for methanol (CH3OH). Based upon this structure you have drawn, and your knowledge of Lewis structures answer these three questions:
A. Predict the hydrogen-to-carbon-to-hydrogen bond angle. Explain your reasoning for this prediction. B. Predict the hydrogen-to-oxygen-to-carbon bond angle. Explain your reasoning for this prediction. C. Why is it said that "Lewis dot structures show linkages (what is hooked to what) but do not show shape"? Explain what is meant by this statement, using the model of methanol you have created as an example.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


The hydrogen-to-carbon-to-hydrogen bond angle I predicted is 109.5 degrees. Lewis structures can't show shape because of the limitations of the two dimension of paper. Other than that, I am not sure what I am doing...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
this molecule is not a regular tetrahedral. the oxygen atom is responsible for this. try to find out why?
 
is it because the oxygen atom goes off to the side, instead of being at the center *clueless*:(
 
so it my H to C to H correct at being 109.5? I can't find anything in my book that talks about the oxgyen atom in regards to this...
 
oooops... i think i said something wrong...the molecule is tetrahedral.
the H - C - H bond angle is 109.5 and so is the OH - C - H

but the CH3 - O - H is not 109.5
first think about the bond angle in water ( H - O - H )
and then deduce whether the angle will be slightly less or slightly more.
 
would it be slightly less at about 107.3? But then I wondered if it would be about 117. When predicting the hydrogen-to-oxygen-to-carbon angle, do I need to account for the three in there as in CH3 - O - H...Right, wrong? Help:)
 
no, we are comparing the bond angle in water, H - O - H which is about 105 degrees and the bongle in CH3 - O - H. the difference between these 2 is that the hydrogen i water is replaced by the CH3. now, would this angle be greater or smaller than 105?

the bond angle cannot be about 117 degrees. there are 2 bonds in the molecule. but there are also two lone pairs on the oxygen atom. these lone pairs repel the 2 bond pairs. instead of being at 180 degrees(a liniear molecule) water is bent to about 105 degrees. molecules like ammonia have bond angle 117 degrees.
 
I want to say that it would be smaller than 105, but I am not sure how much smaller.
 
errmm actually it is slightly larger. the CH3 is fatter in size than the H. The bond angle increases. it becomes about 109.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
ok, so now I am mega confused (like I already wasn't). In the email I got saying I had a reply to this message, it says that it becomes about 107.5. But when I linked into this post, it says 109? Which one?:)
 
  • #11
I don't know if it will help, but this is what the email body had in it, "errmm actually is a slightly larger. the CH3 is fatter in size than the H. the CH3 resists the repulsion, and the bond angle increases. it becomes about 107.5."
 
  • #12
i'm soo sorry... i editted the post. i just googled a lil bit about this and found that actually the bond angle is 109. its almost the same as the H - C - H bond.
 
  • #13
no problem. i wondered if you had edited.
you know the movie dazed and confused? well that is my motto with chemistry:) This forum is a huge help!
 
  • #14
hey is it true that isooctane isomers have bond angles of 60 degrees. I think I read it somewhere when I googled something, but now I can't find it...
 
  • #15
also... are the 18 different compounds of the formula C8H18, have different angles. It seems to me that most of them are construtcted differently so they could not share the exact same bond angle....
 
  • #16
i never heard of this. maybe you came across cyclo alkanes. cyclopropane has a bond angle of 60. they have general formula CnH2n.

an isomer of propene can therefore be cyclo propane. (they both have the same molecular formula)

but for iso octane i dunno.

alkanes usually have isomers of the same family. (all isomers are alkanes) and the angles are 109.5

alkenes and other families have isomers with different bond angles, as with cycloalkanes.

yeah this forum is very helpful. I'm in my last year of high school, it helps a lot, use it to the max.

i didn't see this movie, i'll try to get it though...lol
 
  • #17
Who knows what I came across...thanks for explaining the above to me. Wow, you know a lot for only being in HS!:) (((claps))) I am taking intro chemistry because I did not take it in HS and now that I am in my twenties, I need it for enterence requirements to the nursing program. Thanks so much for all your help:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
29K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K