MHB What are the real and imaginary parts of z in terms of w?

AI Thread Summary
To express the real and imaginary parts of z in terms of w, the equation 1/z = 1/2 + 1/(iw) + 1/(i+1)w needs to be manipulated. The forum encourages users to share their attempts to solve the problem to facilitate better assistance. Duplicate postings are discouraged to avoid wasting helpers' time. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clarity in questions and the need for relevant mathematical context. Providing initial attempts can lead to more effective guidance in solving the equation.
yenyen
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Given that 1/z = 1/2 + 1/(iw) + 1/(i+1)w
Express the real and imaginary parts of z in term of w.Someone please help me to solve it.. THANK YOU!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, yenyen! :D

I have deleted the duplicate posting of this thread. We ask that you only post a question once. Posting a question multiple times can lead to duplication of effort on the part of our helpers, whose time is valuable.

I have moved the remaining thread here, because this question does not involve calculus or analysis.

We also ask that people posting questions show what they have tried so that our helpers know where you are stuck and how best to help. Can you post what you have tried?
 

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Is it valid to express a complex number as a vector?
Replies
8
Views
2K
B What is the Difference between imaginary part and imaginary number?
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB Finding Real Part of $z$ for Complex Numbers
Replies
1
Views
1K
B Principal square root of a complex number, why is it unique?
Replies
13
Views
5K
A Help needed with derivation: solving a complex double integral
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB Imaginary numbers and real numbers?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I How can you represent a point by "z = x + iy" as shown here?
Replies
10
Views
2K
B How can complex numbers be elevated to complex powers?
Replies
12
Views
3K
B Does this help solve the Riemann Hypothesis?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Imaginary Pythagorus
Replies
12
Views
231

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top