What Are the Roots of sinh(z) = 1/2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter whizzkid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Roots Sin
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the roots of the equation sinh(z) = 1/2, which involves complex logarithms and the properties of exponential functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the transformation of the equation into a quadratic form and discuss the implications of taking logarithms of complex numbers. There are attempts to clarify the properties of logarithms and the correct interpretation of the function involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning assumptions about logarithmic properties and the validity of approximations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the periodic nature of complex exponentials, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of the proposed solutions.

Contextual Notes

There is confusion regarding the notation used (sinh vs. sin h) and the implications of approximating values in the context of complex logarithms.

whizzkid
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find all the roots of sin h(z) = 1/2

2. The attempt at a solution

sin h(z) = [1/2](e^z - e^-z) = 1/2
=> e^z -e^-z = 1
=> e^2z - e^z - 1 = 0 {multiplied e^z bothsides}
this is a quadratic equation in e^z using quadratic formula,

e^z = [1+- sqrt(5)]/2

taking 'ln' on bothsides

z = ln[{1+- sqrt(5)}/2]

And after this step I am confused, what to do next and how to find all the roots?

can someone help me out in this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just remember that

[tex]e^{2k\pi i} =1 \ , \forall k\in\mathbb{Z}[/tex]

Daniel.
 
i can think of
z = ln(1/2 +-(sqrt(5)/2)
z = ln(1.61) and z = ln(-0.61)

and ln(-ive) is not defined.

:(
 
Last edited:
No way is it true that ln(a+b)=ln a +ln b.

Daniel.
 
yupp u r right!
 
Last edited:
Nowhere on that page does it state that ln(a+b)=lna+lnb.

The correct result, which is stated, is ln(ab)=lna+lnb
 
omg... cristo... I got ur point.I m making a blunder actually ...ok
i come up wid sumthing new and edited my aforementioned post!
 
z = ln(1/2 +-(sqrt(5)/2)

z = ln(1+sqrt(5)/2) and z = ln(1-sqrt(5)/2)
z = ln(3.24)-ln(2)+2k*pi*i and z = ln(1.24)-ln(2)+2k*pi*i

0.48+2k*pi*i and -0.48+2k*pi*i

we can say +-1/2 + 2k*pi*i

is this solution correct?
 
You can't approximate to 1/2. It's actually better if you leave it in the original form, the one still containing natural logs.

Daniel.
 
  • #10
whizzkid said:
z = ln(1/2 +-(sqrt(5)/2)

z = ln(1+sqrt(5)/2) and z = ln(1-sqrt(5)/2)
z = ln(3.24)-ln(2)+2k*pi*i and z = ln(1.24)-ln(2)+2k*pi*i

0.48+2k*pi*i and -0.48+2k*pi*i

we can say +-1/2 + 2k*pi*i

is this solution correct?

0.48 is not 1/2! Don't approximate.

By the way, it is sinh(x) not sin h(x). I first thought you meant sine of some function h(x)!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K