What are the steps for solving a circuit using node voltage analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rugerts
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a circuit using node voltage analysis, specifically focusing on finding the node voltages through Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) equations. Participants are examining the setup and validity of the equations derived from the circuit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of KCL at each node and the validity of including additional equations. There is a focus on ensuring the independence of equations and the correct transcription of terms into the matrix. Some participants question the handling of specific currents and coefficients in the equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants providing guidance on the necessity of independent equations and the concept of supernodes. There is acknowledgment of potential errors in transcription and the need for clarity in the equations used.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the presence of a voltage source creating a fixed potential difference between nodes, which influences the number of essential nodes considered in the analysis.

rugerts
Messages
153
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


Using node voltage analysis, find the node voltages.

Homework Equations


n-1 Kirchhoff's Current Law equations for n nodes (since ground is a node).

The Attempt at a Solution


IMG-1910.JPG
IMG-1911.JPG

I've tried doing KCL at each node and then getting a fourth equation from a potential difference between nodes 2 and 3. I'm not sure if taking the fourth equation is entirely valid but I do believe I have seen this been done before solving using substitution. I am trying, however, to use Cramer's Rule through a calculator.

Since uploading pictures here always seems to turn out blurry, here's an imgur link: https://imgur.com/Xd8gqRx
 

Attachments

  • IMG-1910.JPG
    IMG-1910.JPG
    33.5 KB · Views: 1,364
  • IMG-1911.JPG
    IMG-1911.JPG
    26.8 KB · Views: 681
Physics news on Phys.org
2 of your equations use the current i, but only second row of the matrix has a coefficient which will multiply by i.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rugerts
I think you didn't transcribe correctly or forgot some terms when this one got put into the matrx:

Circuit_eq.jpg


And yes you should have 4 independent equations if you want to solve for the 4 unknown variables. It appears that your equations are independent.
 

Attachments

  • Circuit_eq.jpg
    Circuit_eq.jpg
    17.3 KB · Views: 606
scottdave said:
2 of your equations use the current i, but only second row of the matrix has a coefficient which will multiply by i.
Well, it looks like that was the solution because my answers now agree with what the book has. Thank you for the keen eye! I appreciate the help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
Note that nodes V2 and V3 have a fixed potential difference thanks to the voltage source V. Hence, V2 and V3 comprise a supernode, and you have only two essential nodes. The circuit can be solved using just two node equations, (say for V1 and the supernode V2/3).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave and rugerts

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K