What Are the Steps to Solve a Boundary Condition Problem with Three Conditions?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a boundary condition problem involving potential distribution in a two-dimensional half-plane, specifically using Laplace's equation. The original poster is trying to deduce an expression for the potential distribution given specific boundary conditions along the x-axis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses confusion regarding the application of three boundary conditions to determine coefficients in the potential distribution. Some participants suggest using Fourier analysis as a method to approach the problem, discussing the relationship between boundary conditions and Fourier transforms.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing insights into the use of Fourier transforms to handle the boundary conditions. The original poster indicates progress but still seeks clarification on applying the boundary conditions effectively.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes difficulty with the specific boundary conditions: phi=0 for x<-a and x>a, and phi=phi0 for -a

Mazimillion
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, this question has been bugging me for weeks and any help would be greatly appreciated.

In lectures we derived a general expression for the potential distribution across the xy half plane (y>0) in terms of a known potential distribution along the boundary defined by the x-axis where the potential,phi, is described by Laplace's equation in 2-D. In the case where the potential along the boundary is: 0 for x greater than equal to a, 0 for x less then equal to -a, phi0 for -a<x<a, deduce an expression for the potential distribution throughout the half plane.

I think what is getting me are the 3 boundary conditions - I'm not sure exactly what i should be doing with them to find values for the coefficients.

i'm sorry that it's not very clear but if you have any ideas they would be greatly appreciated

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution to these things is always Fourier analysis, or something like it.

There are two boundary conditions here: the potential should go to zero as y gets large, and it should become your specified function of x when y is 0. Because we want the potential to die off, we have a decaying exponential in the y direction, and the general solution is a weighted sum of terms like like Ae^(-ky)e^(ikx). Since you can't restrict the value of k at all, this sum becomes an integral: Int A(k) e^(-ky)e^(ikx) dk. When y is 0, you know that the potential is your given f(x), so f(x) = Int A(k) e^(ikx) dx. So A(k) is just the Fourier transform of your boundary condition f(x)!

So, find A(k) by taking the Fourier transform of f(x), plug it into your original integral with e^(-ky), and you are done!
 
Last edited:
Thanks for that - I've really made some progress. The only problem now is applying the boundary conditions on the x-axis. How do I apply both phi=0 for x<-a, x>a and phi=phi0 for -a<x<a?

I'm probably missing something really simple but I've been pulling my hair out for ages.

Thanks
 
The integral I've mentioned is from k = negative infinity to positive infinity. f(x) is how I'm referring to your pulse between -a and a on the x axis.

The key is that A(k) and f(x) are a Fourier transform pair. Did they not discuss this in your class? So if f(x) = Int A(k) e^(ikx) dx, then A(k) = (1/2 pi) Int f(x) e^(-ikx) dx, where this integral is over all space. Since f(x) is zero except between -a and a, you can change the limits to there.
 
Got it now

Thanks a million, you've been a great help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K