What Are the True Dimensions of Physical Units in Physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of physical units in physics, specifically focusing on dimensional analysis and the interpretation of units such as Joules, Newton-seconds, and Watts. Participants clarify that dimensions represent physical quantities and emphasize the importance of understanding the relationships between these units. The conversation highlights that while dimensional analysis aids in grasping fundamental physics concepts, it may become less effective with complex equations. The analogy of "man-hours" is used to illustrate how different combinations of units can yield the same result without knowing individual values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dimensional analysis in physics
  • Familiarity with basic physical units (e.g., Joules, Newtons, Watts)
  • Knowledge of equations involving physical quantities
  • Concept of proportional relationships in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of dimensional analysis in greater depth
  • Study the relationships between different physical units, such as Joules and Newtons
  • Learn about the implications of unit conversions in physics
  • Investigate the application of dimensional analysis in complex equations
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in physics, engineering, and related fields who seek to deepen their understanding of physical units and their relationships in various equations.

Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Hi =D

I was thinking about the physical units (g, m, s, K, J, A, V, etc). I know we got a thing in physics called dimensional analysis, so you analyse some variable that you know it depends on other variables and the two sides of the "equation" (I mean a equation with the proportional sign instead of equal sign) have to have the same "dimension" (the same units).

We also use to talk: "The dimension of velocity is the dimension of space over the dimension of time.".

Why do we call "dimension" the units of physics? Has this term "dimension" the same meaning of when we talk that time is the fourth dimension in space-time, of when we talk that a equation like "x + y + z = 0" describes a plane?

What's the correct way to imagine the dimensions of the physical units in a graph? What about a complicated concept that has lots of base units like electric current (measured in A), or even a simple one (Joule = kg * m^2 / s^2)? How should I imagine this complicated combination of dimensions? Does it has really intuitive and physical meaning, or is a pure result of the mathematics?

Other questions...

I know how to understand a unit like Watt: Watt is equals to Joules per second, so if we have a resistor that dissipates 2W of power we can talk that this resistor converts 2 Joules of electrical energy into thermal energy (heat) in one second.
But what about units like N*s (unit of impulse), or Joules (N*m)? How do I understand that? I have a understanding of these units but I don't know if it's right so check it please: I understand that if we have 5J or 5N*m I have two values encapsulated in this number: we of course don't know what are the values separately but we know that they multiplied is 5, and I can also conclude that we have two physical concepts encapsulated on unit Joule (force in N and space in m), that's right? Am I thinking right?

Any contributions are welcome... Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taturana said:
Hi =D
But what about units like N*s (unit of impulse), or Joules (N*m)? How do I understand that? I have a understanding of these units but I don't know if it's right so check it please: I understand that if we have 5J or 5N*m I have two values encapsulated in this number: we of course don't know what are the values separately but we know that they multiplied is 5, and I can also conclude that we have two physical concepts encapsulated on unit Joule (force in N and space in m), that's right? Am I thinking right?

Any contributions are welcome... Thanks

As for this question, think of the unit like "man-hours". If a job requires 100 man-hours to finish, it could be accomplished in 10 hours with 10 people, or in 4 hours with 25 people, etc. you are right that we don't know what the values are separately. We don't know that a job that requires 100 man-hours to finish requires 1 or 10 or 25 people. We just know it requires a combination of workers * hours = 100.
 
I actually has the same question with yours initially, thinking in terms of dimensions really helps understanding the physics, however, when equation get more complicated, dimension analysis becomes less efficiency for understanding the physics. So I changed my habit to vary the parameters in the equation and see the effect, eg, v=L/t, if t is shorter, then v is larger. This kind of thinking is quite useful when dealing with complicated equation. I think:)
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K