Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around uncommon coordinate systems in physics, exploring their existence, applications, and whether there are standard references for them. Participants share various coordinate systems beyond the commonly known ones and discuss their relevance in different contexts, including theoretical and practical applications.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant inquires about uncommon coordinate systems beyond the standard Cartesian, Polar, Cylindrical, and Spherical systems.
- Another participant asserts that the common systems are taught due to their symmetry properties relevant to the problems being addressed.
- Skew coordinates are mentioned as an example, particularly in the context of General Relativity and the metric tensor.
- Several participants reference a table of orthogonal coordinates available on Wikipedia, indicating it contains various systems.
- Specific uncommon systems such as parabolic cylindrical, elliptic cylindrical, and oblate spherical coordinates are identified, with one participant noting their potential applications in physics.
- Parabolic coordinates are highlighted for their utility in quantum mechanics, particularly in scattering problems and the Stark effect.
- It is noted that many coordinate systems lack specific names and are instead described by their mathematical properties.
- Moon and Spencer's "Field Theory Handbook" is cited as a resource containing a compendium of coordinate systems and their applications.
- Elliptic coordinates are mentioned in the context of geodesy, while Rindler coordinates are brought up in relation to special relativity.
- Milne coordinates are noted for their usefulness in expressing solutions in relativistic hydrodynamics.
- The tangential and normal component system is discussed in the context of mechanical dynamics and curvilinear motion.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express a variety of views on the existence and utility of uncommon coordinate systems, with no consensus reached on a definitive list or standard references. Multiple competing perspectives on the relevance and application of these systems remain present throughout the discussion.
Contextual Notes
Some participants emphasize the mathematical properties of coordinate systems rather than their names, suggesting that the choice of system may depend on the specific physical context or problem being addressed.