MHB What Are the Variable Restrictions in the Equation 5/x = (10/3x) + 4?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rynesdad5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
AI Thread Summary
The equation 5/x = (10/3x) + 4 has variable restrictions due to the denominators, which cannot be zero. Specifically, x cannot equal zero and x cannot equal zero from the second fraction, meaning x must be greater than zero. The solution to the equation is x = 5/12, which is valid under these restrictions. It's important to ensure that any solution does not violate the restrictions set by the denominators. Therefore, the final answer is valid as it adheres to the necessary conditions.
rynesdad5
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Write the restrictions on the variables for the following equation. Keeping in mind the restrictions, solve the equation

5/x=(10/3x)+4

Here is what I did, but I'm not sure if it's right.

(3x)(5/x)=(3x)[(10/3x)+4]

15=(3x)(10/3x)+(3x)4

15=10+12x

5=12x

x=5/12

But I don't know what to do about the restrictions. Can someone help? Thank you in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi rynesdad5,:)

Welcome to MHB!

You've solved the problem correctly but you have to keep in mind that the denominator of any fraction cannot be zero. If the denominator is zero, then the expression is not real because its overall value is undefined, since, e.g. $\dfrac{2}{0}=\infty$.

In your problem, you have two fractions there, one is $\dfrac{5}{x}$ and the other is $\dfrac{10}{3x}$. What can you say about the value(s) of $x$ that you couldn't take for these two fractions?
 
rynesdad5 said:
Write the restrictions on the variables for the following equation. Keeping in mind the restrictions, solve the equation

5/x=(10/3x)+4

Here is what I did, but I'm not sure if it's right.

(3x)(5/x)=(3x)[(10/3x)+4]

15=(3x)(10/3x)+(3x)4

15=10+12x

5=12x

x=5/12

But I don't know what to do about the restrictions. Can someone help? Thank you in advance.

I think you have solved the problem correctly..If x is in denominator itself you should take care of x,it should not be zero
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top