What Are We Doing About The Next Big Geomagnetic Storm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nspyred
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Storm
AI Thread Summary
The upcoming solar sunspot cycle, peaking around 2012-2013, raises concerns about potential geomagnetic storms impacting electrical infrastructure. Strategies for mitigation include hardening infrastructure against geomagnetic induced currents and improving communication between power networks to prevent cascade failures. The discussion highlights the importance of preparing for outages, particularly in regions with less robust grids, like the northeastern U.S. There is also mention of advancements in protective equipment, such as new breakers designed to prevent transformer burn-outs. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for proactive measures to safeguard against the effects of geomagnetic storms.
Nspyred
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Yo.

As many of you know, the solar sunspot cycle is scheduled to peak again around 2012-2013. With it will come geomagnetic storms that will once again stress our electrical infrastructure.

I was wondering: what sort of strategies do we have to mitigate against this threat? Do we just power down? Can we figure out how to add it to the grid? Do we just "take it"?

Is this just an electrical and aerospace engineering problem, or are there others thinking about this as well?

I have read about "hardening" electrical infrastructure against transients and EMI, but what exactly does this mean?

Thanks for any input.
PS I am a 1st year EE with interests in electric power and electromagnetics.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Power grids are mostly a problem for large systems far north. Canada and europe put a lot of money into improving grid systems since the 80s with cutt outs and surge protection.
I don't know about the US, since everything is owned by private companies it's unlikely a lot has been put into once in a generation events.

We rely a lot less on satelite communications than we did 10years ago - but a lot more on GPS. I'm guessing that the original customers of GPS would have specificed them to work in rare bad conditions.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if the US grid went down a few times during the next storm. I live in the NE part of the US and the grid isn't exactly known for being robust or reliable (remember the blackout of 03?). I know I'll be stocking up on a few extra candles and cans of chef-boyardee.
 
2012-2013 ??

I think the cycle is running a bit late: My guess is nearer 2015-16...

IIRC, the first big problem is geomagnetic induced current, low-frequency AC that swamps the cores of the big distribution transformers. IIRC, a lot of new breakers etc have been fitted to prevent burn-outs.

The other issue is 'cascade failure'. As I see it, the networks just have to talk to each other a bit better, and be prepared to 'ring fence' outages rather than go down like dominoes...
 
Nik_2213 said:
2012-2013 ??

I think the cycle is running a bit late: My guess is nearer 2015-16...

Just in time for me to graduate...:wink:

Nik_2213 said:
IIRC, the first big problem is geomagnetic induced current, low-frequency AC that swamps the cores of the big distribution transformers. IIRC, a lot of new breakers etc have been fitted to prevent burn-outs.

The other issue is 'cascade failure'. As I see it, the networks just have to talk to each other a bit better, and be prepared to 'ring fence' outages rather than go down like dominoes...

I have read somewhere that power system protection is computationally intensive. Is this true? How so? Is it from CEM, or from control theory calculations?
I don't have the link. It doesn't matter anyway, the blogger did not say how it was computationally intensive, just that it was.

Oh, and thanks for the reply.
IIRC ("If I recall correctly")? That is a new one for me.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top