Chalnoth
Science Advisor
- 6,197
- 449
Well, since you'd usually use Newtonian gravity in this situation, you probably would. But my point is that when you work with General Relativity, there simply isn't any potential energy term there, and furthermore there is not even any good way to define one in general.Drakkith said:Care to elaborate? I don't know why you wouldn't use something like potential energy in this situation.