What can an observer see during his travel into BH?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wangyi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Observer Travel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the observations and implications for an observer traveling towards the event horizon of a black hole (BH). Participants explore the effects of extreme gravitational fields on light, the potential for observing the future of the universe, and the implications for causality and perception upon crossing the horizon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that as an observer approaches the BH horizon, they experience extreme blue-shifting of light from distant stars, potentially allowing them to see the far future of the universe.
  • Others argue that this perception does not equate to witnessing the entire future history of the universe, as once inside the horizon, the observer is limited to a finite experience before reaching the singularity.
  • A participant mentions the necessity of ray tracing to understand the light paths and the complexities involved in calculating what an observer would see while falling into a black hole.
  • One contributor explains that the blueshift observed is relative to stationary observers outside the black hole and that the geometry near the horizon behaves similarly to Minkowski space in certain coordinates.
  • Another participant emphasizes that inertial observers crossing the horizon do not experience any special phenomena that would violate causality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether an observer can truly see the entire future of the universe as they approach the horizon. While some suggest that the extreme blueshift allows for this perception, others contend that the experience is finite and does not imply a violation of causality. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes complex concepts such as the effects of gravitational fields on light, the nature of observer experiences in different coordinate systems, and the implications for causality, which may depend on specific assumptions and interpretations of general relativity.

wangyi
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi, i am confused by the following question:
When an observer is going towards the horizon of a BH from outside, he finds the light from far away so blue shifted that the far future of the far away world presents in front of him. Does that mean when he is crossing the horizon, he has seen everything in the infinite future?
If it's true, there are questions:
1. Does this break the causal principle? As the observer has got information of the whole universe, including information outside his particle horizon.
2. When he has droped into the BH, what can he see? As he has seen everything before he drops into the BH, and what he sees after he goes cross the horizon seems to be at time "after" infinity.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wangyi said:
Hi, i am confused by the following question:
When an observer is going towards the horizon of a BH from outside, he finds the light from far away so blue shifted that the far future of the far away world presents in front of him. Does that mean when he is crossing the horizon, he has seen everything in the infinite future?

What makes you think this?

To actually calculate the path of the light is somewhat involved, the only way I can think of to do it would be to do a ray trace.

The only website I've seen that talks about this topic has some nice graphics, but doesn't go into the detail of how the calculations were performed.

http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/schw.shtml

(This site has several movies, note that only one of the later movies is a straightforwards dive, see the introduction for details).

http://www.fourmilab.ch/gravitation/orbits/ and textbooks like MTW go into the math of how to calculate photon orbits, but don't present any visual picture of what one would "see" falling into a black hole.

The first website has a quiz section. Look at question #2

2) As you fall freely into a black hole, you see the entire future of the Universe played out before your eyes. True or false?

Click on the blue question mark to be directed to the answer:

Answer to the quiz question 2: False. You do NOT see all the future history of the world played out. Once inside the horizon, you are doomed to hit the singularity in a finite time, and you witness only a finite (in practice rather short) time pass in the outside Universe.

IIn order to watch the history of the Universe unfold, you would have to remain outside the horizon, the Schwarzschild surface. One way to watch all the history of the Universe would be to stay just above the horizon, firing your rockets like crazy just to stay put. The Universe would then appear not only speeded up, but also highly blueshifted (probably roasting you in gamma rays), and concentrated in a tiny piece of the sky just above you.

For a quick "sanity check", let's consider the case where someone is falling straight into a black hole, and is at the photon sphere at 1.5 x the Schwarzschild radius. For a stationary observer at this location, any photons emitted "in front" will fall into the black hole. To figure out what we see, we use the idea of ray tracing.

http://www.siggraph.org/education/materials/HyperGraph/raytrace/rtrace1.htm

We reverse time and ask "where would any visible photons come from"? We want a photon that originates at a distant star, and impacts our location. To do this, we reverse time and trace the outgoing path of a time-reversed photon, and see if it intersects any stars.

The black hole is black, so photons can't start from it. They must come from some object outside the black hole. We will assume that the light we see comes from some distant star, thus we need a reversed-time photon orbit that escapes to infinity.

We can see immediately that for the stationary observer, any such "reversed time" photons must come from behind the observer, not in front (because any photons emitted to the front fall in, any photons that come from the front must have come from the black hole, and the black hole is black).

A falling observer will see things differently due to relatavistic abberation due to his infalling velocity. This will make some of the photons which appeared to fall from "in back" of the stationary observer to be aberrated towards the front. So the black hole will not fill half the sky at the photon sphere for an infalling observer as one might expect. It will still fill a substantial portion of the sky, which will appear black. This seems to tie in reasonably well with the graphics on the website I mentioned earlier.
 
Thank you very much for your explanation and so many useful referances.
 
**Hi, i am confused by the following question:
When an observer is going towards the horizon of a BH from outside, he finds the light from far away so blue shifted that the far future of the far away world presents in front of him. Does that mean when he is crossing the horizon, he has seen everything in the infinite future?
If it's true, there are questions:
1. Does this break the causal principle? As the observer has got information of the whole universe, including information outside his particle horizon.
2. When he has droped into the BH, what can he see? As he has seen everything before he drops into the BH, and what he sees after he goes cross the horizon seems to be at time "after" infinity.
Thank you! **

Not at all ! You must understand that the blueshift of light occurs with respect to the clock of the stationary observer which never falls into the black hole. The geometry at the event horizon is as good as Minkowski in Rindler coordinates and solutions to the Klein Gordon equation approximately behave as plane waves (in those coordinates). However, it is the stationary congruence of observers which gives rise to a singular coordinate transformation, whence the infinite blueshift as you approach the horizon. Actually, the worldlines of the stationary observers are infinitely squeezed together due to very large boosts (in the Rindler coordinates) as you approach the horizon (thus the measure sticks are infinetly expanded) which explains why those observers experience an extreme blueshift.

On the other hand, inertial observers in the Rindler coordinate system will not feel anything special when they cross the horizon and there is certainly no violation of causality.

Cheers,

Careful
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
4K