What can weak lensing be used for?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lensing Weak
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Weak gravitational lensing (GL) is a crucial technique used by astronomers to detect and measure dark matter by analyzing the shapes and orientations of distant galaxies. This method relies on the bending of light caused by mass concentrations, such as galaxy clusters, which allows for the reconstruction of mass distributions, including background dark matter. The effectiveness of weak lensing is contingent upon observing a large number of galaxies to accurately measure the shear in the lensing field. Consequently, estimates of dark matter density derived from weak lensing may only represent a lower limit, as they depend on the distortion caused by concentrated mass.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational lensing principles
  • Familiarity with dark matter and dark energy concepts
  • Knowledge of galaxy morphology and orientation
  • Experience with statistical analysis of astronomical data
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gravitational lensing in detail
  • Study the methodologies for measuring dark matter density using weak lensing
  • Explore the differences between dark matter and dark energy
  • Investigate the statistical techniques used in analyzing galaxy shape distributions
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and researchers interested in cosmology, particularly those focused on dark matter detection and gravitational lensing techniques.

oldman
Messages
632
Reaction score
5
Gravitational lensing (GL), first mooted in 1924, is now a technique being used by astronomers to detect dark matter. Lensing depends on the bending of light by the gravity of a mass concentration, such as a galaxy or galaxy cluster.

In glass, it is the spatial gradient of the optical path length that causes lensing. There is no lensing of light passing through a uniform parallel-sided glass slab.

With gravitation, I imagine that it is the spatial gradient of the integrated gravitational potential along the optical path that causes lensing. If I'm right, there can be no GL of light passing through a uniform distribution of dark matter (or energy, which also generates a gravitational potential).

Does this mean that the density of dark matter can only be measured from the distortion of galaxy shapes behind concentrated objects like galaxy clusters, and nowhere else? Might any estimate of the overall density of dark matter obtained from weak lensing measurements then be only a lower limit?

And how do we know that the dark matter recently detected is not in fact dark energy, or a mixture of the two? Or have I got it all wrong?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Background dark matter?

oldman said:
... Does this mean that the density of dark matter can only be measured from the distortion of galaxy shapes behind concentrated objects like galaxy clusters, and nowhere else? Might any estimate of the overall density of dark matter obtained from weak lensing measurements then be only a lower limit?

Hi Oldman, I'm also puzzled by this - according to the Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_gravitational_lensing"
"By measuring the shapes and orientations of large numbers of distant galaxies, their orientations can be averaged to measure the shear of the lensing field in any region. This, in turn, can be used to reconstruct the mass distribution in the area: in particular, the background distribution of dark matter can be reconstructed. Since galaxies are intrinsically elliptical and the weak gravitational lensing signal is small, a very large number of galaxies must be used in these surveys.", specifically the emphasized phrase (emphasis by myself).

I can somewhat understand how the dark matter contribution to the total mass of the cluster is determined, but background dark matter? Science advisor help required!

Jorrie
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Assume galaxies are oriented randomly and evenly in all directions. If viewed through a strong gravitational lens, these galaxies will all appear distorted to produce concentric rings around the center of the lens. If viewed through a weak gravitational lens, the galaxies will just appear to have orientations statistically tilted slightly to align less with the the center of the lens (producing very subtle rings). If astronomers observe this, they can infer the existence (and some properties) of such a weak gravitational lens. They can also separately attempt to directly observe the mass producing the lens (most likely a galaxy in the very middle of the distorted region), and infer properties of the visible mass there. If the two observations don't add up, they can conclude some mass is invisible to them. Without investigating wiki's references (as you ought, if you're that perplexed by its phrasing), I understand this is what they're calling the background distribution of dark matter. The approach is applicable not just to galactic dark matter distributions (unlike rotation curves), but also to dark matter throughout intergalactic space.
 
Last edited:
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K