What can you say about the numbers a, b, c and d?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gramsci
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conditions under which the system of equations defined by constants a, b, c, and d remains consistent for all values of f and g. The equations are represented as ax1 + bx2 = f and cx1 + dx2 = g. It is established that a must be non-zero to facilitate row reduction, and the system becomes inconsistent if the second row of the augmented matrix results in (0, d, g) with d being non-zero. The participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying row reduction techniques to analyze the system's consistency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically systems of equations.
  • Familiarity with row reduction techniques and augmented matrices.
  • Knowledge of the implications of zero and non-zero entries in matrix rows.
  • Basic proficiency in manipulating algebraic expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of Gaussian elimination for solving systems of equations.
  • Learn about the implications of the rank of a matrix on system consistency.
  • Explore the concept of linear independence and dependence in vector spaces.
  • Investigate the role of determinants in determining the solvability of linear systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as anyone involved in solving systems of equations and understanding matrix theory.

Gramsci
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Suppose a, b, c and d are constants such that a is not zero and the system below is consistent for all possible values of f and g. What can you say about the numbers a, b, c and d? Justify your answer.




Homework Equations


ax1+bx2=f
cx1+dx2=g


The Attempt at a Solution


I've been trying to think about it but I can't seem to get any closer to a solution. My basic thoughts is that we must perform some row reduction, but I'm not really sure how we should do it. I would love some help.
/gramsci
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should row-reduce the 2nd row using the first row of the augmented matrix. Note that you have to multiply the first row by some multiple before adding it to the second row will yield a 0 for the first entry from the left of the second, which is why it is assumed that a is non-zero.

After you've done that, look at the contents of the 2nd row. Note that the system is inconsistent if the 2nd entry of the 2nd row is 0 and the 3rd entry of the 2nd row is non-zero. Write that out.
 
Ah, I multiply the first row by -c, which I guess is the right multiple and then add it to the second row which yields:
(-a, d-bc, g-fc) and after I restore the first row and add it to the second row I get the second row to be :
(0, d-c, g-c) and since c is 0 =
(0, d, g)
Then I understand what you meant. But it feels as if I performe some error during my calculations here, I'm guessing that I could've multiplied the first row wrong. If I did do any errors,please give me some leads.

/Thankfully, Gramsci
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K