What caused us to have relative time

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spaced-out
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relative Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of relative time as defined by the theory of relativity, particularly the implications of clock synchronization and the invariant speed of light. Participants reference "Introduction to the Theory of Relativity" by Sears & Brehme, emphasizing that different observers measure time intervals differently due to the lack of absolute synchronization of clocks. The conversation highlights that the laws of physics, specifically the two postulates of relativity established by Einstein in 1905, dictate that time is relative, leading to phenomena such as time dilation and the relativity of simultaneity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Special Relativity principles
  • Familiarity with Einstein's two postulates of relativity
  • Knowledge of clock synchronization and its implications
  • Basic grasp of electromagnetic theory and its relation to time measurement
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Einstein's 1905 paper on Special Relativity
  • Explore the concept of time dilation in various inertial frames
  • Investigate the implications of the invariant speed of light on physical laws
  • Learn about the relativity of simultaneity and its experimental confirmations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of relativity, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of time measurement and the implications of Einstein's theories on modern physics.

  • #61
Nugatory said:
All inputs are not symmetrical in the SR version of the twin paradox, which is why it is at least logically possible that conclusion be non-symmetric.

The asymmetry is physically apparent in the fact that the twins experience different acceleration.

It will also show up quite clearly if you just try working the problem in a frame in which the traveling twin is at rest during either the outbound or the inbound leg of the trip (Try it! Don't just take my word for it).

I think sugdub doesn't dispute the twins scenario (because there is asymmetry). What he/she claims is that the symmetric time dilation is not 'real' or 'actual' precisely because it is symmetric.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Sugdub said:
You are welcome. Concerning clocks “actually" running slow I precisely mean what physicists indicate in the context of the “twins” thought experiment: the “moving twin”, when coming back, will be younger than the other one, because his/her clock ran slower all along the trip.
Then nature disagrees with you. Clocks do "actually" run slow according to your definition. This experiment has been done many times in many different ways, and the results agree with SR's predictions.

Sugdub said:
My statement is that SR cannot, from a pure logical standpoint, justify that the “moving clock” ran slower: all inputs being fully symmetrical, the conclusion cannot be non-symmetrical.
Your statement is irrelevant for two reasons.

First, it is irrelevant because the assertion that you are attributing to SR is not an assertion that SR makes for inertial clocks. I detailed the assertion that SR actually makes above, and that one is fully symmetrical for inertial clocks. Your objection is therefore simply a strawman fallacy.

Second, it is irrelevant because your definition of "actually" involves an asymmetric situation. So an argument from symmetry simply doesn't apply to whether or not clocks "actually" slow down.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 15characters
  • #63
PAllen said:
I think sugdub doesn't dispute the twins scenario (because there is asymmetry). What he/she claims is that the symmetric time dilation is not 'real' or 'actual' precisely because it is symmetric.
That isn't what Sugdub mentioned as the definition of "actually".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
709
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
917