What causes the deceleration of a satellite? Space dust?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the factors contributing to the deceleration of satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO). It is established that atmospheric drag, caused by a small amount of gas present at these altitudes, is the primary reason satellites slow down over time. Additionally, gravitational anomalies, such as those caused by significant geological events like the 2011 Japan earthquake, can also affect satellite orbits. Geostationary satellites require fuel for station-keeping to correct for gravitational disturbances from other celestial bodies, including the Moon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of low Earth orbit (LEO) dynamics
  • Familiarity with atmospheric drag effects on satellites
  • Knowledge of gravitational anomalies and their impact on orbits
  • Basic concepts of satellite station-keeping and fuel usage
NEXT STEPS
  • Research atmospheric drag calculations for low Earth orbit satellites
  • Study the effects of gravitational anomalies on satellite trajectories
  • Learn about satellite station-keeping techniques and fuel management
  • Investigate case studies of satellite orbit shifts due to geological events
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, satellite designers, and researchers interested in orbital mechanics and satellite performance optimization.

Robert Scott
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
After talking to a coworker, I looked into the wikipedia article on "Gravity of Earth". I found that the Earth's gravity is not uniform, which makes sense (never thought about it). I have always wondered why satellites de-orbit over time. Someone told me that there is enough space dust to slow down a artificial satellite and they need to speed back up to maintain altitude.

My real question is do the variations in the Earth's gravity slow down a satellite's orbit?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's not variations in the Earth's gravity, it's just that there is a very small, but non-zero amount of gas from the atmosphere at the altitudes that low-orbit satellites orbit at. This gas gradually slows down anything orbiting very close to the Earth, including satellites and the ISS.

Satellites higher up in orbit, geostationary satellites for example, generally need to use fuel to correct for gravitational disturbances from other bodies that disrupt their orbits over time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and Robert Scott
Drakkith said:
It's not variations in the Earth's gravity, it's just that there is a very small, but non-zero amount of gas from the atmosphere at the altitudes that low-orbit satellites orbit at. This gas gradually slows down anything orbiting very close to the Earth, including satellites and the ISS.

Satellites higher up in orbit, geostationary satellites for example, generally need to use fuel to correct for gravitational disturbances from other bodies that disrupt their orbits over time.

Thanks! Good to know for when I start building satellites soon ;-)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith
While the atmospheric drag is the larger component, there are effects due to gravitational anomalies. For example, the 2011 Japan quake actually shifted the orbits of satellites as discussed here - Japan megaquake shifted gravity satellite orbits.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Robert Scott
Drakkith said:
Satellites higher up in orbit, geostationary satellites for example, generally need to use fuel to correct for gravitational disturbances from other bodies that disrupt their orbits over time.
For an unanticipated example of the use of station-keeping fuel, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TDRS-1. The bird did not initially make it to geostationary orbit and had to burn station keeping fuel over a period of months before finally arriving on station.

As I recall from a briefing at the time, one of the key orbital perterbations normally requiring the use of station-keeping fuel is due to the influence of the moon -- it tends to pull craft out of purely equatorial orbits.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Robert Scott and Drakkith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K