What Would Happen if Only the Rich Could Become Super Smart?

  • Thread starter Thread starter randl985
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the implications of a scenario where only the wealthy gain enhanced intelligence, inspired by Poul Anderson's novel "Brain Wave." Participants argue that this would exacerbate social inequalities, leading to a wider gap between the rich and poor, as the affluent would secure better jobs and opportunities. The conversation also touches on the distinction between intelligence and education, emphasizing that increased knowledge does not equate to practical wisdom or social capability. The discussion concludes that sudden changes in intelligence levels, regardless of the definition, would likely disrupt societal structures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of socio-economic dynamics and class structures
  • Familiarity with concepts of intelligence versus education
  • Knowledge of science fiction literature, particularly "Brain Wave" and "Flowers for Algernon"
  • Awareness of psychological concepts related to intelligence and societal behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the socio-economic impacts of education disparities
  • Explore psychological theories on intelligence and emotional intelligence
  • Analyze the themes of intelligence in science fiction literature
  • Investigate historical examples of societal disruption due to sudden changes in knowledge or technology
USEFUL FOR

Readers interested in socio-economic issues, psychologists, educators, and fans of science fiction exploring the implications of intelligence on society.

  • #61
Danger said:
I'd rather just be tossed into a ditch and let the coyotes take care of me.
What happens to your body after your death is not of consequence to you, it is of consequence to the loved ones who survive you. :wink:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
DaveC426913 said:
What happens to your body after your death is not of consequence to you, it is of consequence to the loved ones who survive you. :wink:

Nice try, but the only person with the authority to make the call knows my wishes and won't violate them. In fact, she would disinherit herself if she did so.
 
  • #63
I used the term "heaven" to indicate a state of mind, not a place you go after you die. We do all make choices like Charlie and probably with as little knowledge about what the true consequences would be as Charlie would have. We're well aware that we could and will lose a life that is as close as one can get to our individual version of heaven but this certainly doesn't stop many many us from choosing to find and create that life, because although we know it will not be permanent, we're willing to take the risk of going so high that, like Icarus, the fall will kill us. But what a ride it was.

The saddest people I know are the ones who for some reason, choose to destroy their own happiness through actions of choice.

What made me think about this is a really nice decent, intelligent, attractive, kind young adult I talked to recently, who deliberately destroys any relationship they have with a kind and caring person and who invariably goes back to one who is abusive, and I don't mean just a little bit abusive. I asked this person why and they replied, when I'm with a really good person I always think I don't deserve them. Yes this person had a bad life but it could have been much worse and the person's mother had a much worse life yet makes every effort to continue to improve her situation.

Some won't make the climb because of the pretty great certainly that they will fall, but others, like Charlie, go as high as they can because it's worth it to go there even temporarily.

(A legitimate reason to opt for burial rather than cremation - if at any point after your death medical problems in your living family appear to be inherited or there is some medical question about your death, they can always dig you up and check it out. Also it seems nicer to serve as fertilizer for plants and trees that produce oxygen than to pollute the air with the combustion byproducts)
 
  • #64
Actually, combustion pollutants are pretty low in a crematorium, and the ashes can still be used as a mild fertilizer.
I see your point, though, and apologize for misinterpreting your original statement. Translated to my terms, you were asking if I would bang Sandra Bullock even knowing that I could never do it again. Absolutely! Given my health condition, the experience would probably kill me, but it would be worth it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
17K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
13K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K